[ Keeping an eye on
the Eye of Horus. ]






REVERE [08k] [32k]
GCN [1] [2] [3] [4]
REPUBLIC [16k] [32k]



[ Archives ]

Powered by Blogger


Total911.info::REVERE RADIO NETWORK::Total Info Radio

Tuesday, February 07, 2006

Cartoon editor Fleming Rose and the tentacles of PNAC

    It turns out the editor who originally publshed the "offensive" Muslim cartoons is a disciple of Daniel Pipes and the "clash of civilizations" theory put out by Project for a New American Century. PNAC is the outfit that called for a "Pearl Harbor event' in order to initiate a global war against the Muslim world.

    Crhistopher Bollyn has more in American Free Press, Feb. 4:
    "Under the guise of free speech, a leading Danish newspaper published a dozen provocative anti-Islamic cartoons clearly designed to offend Muslims. The predictable result has greatly increased the possibility of violence and left Denmark in a costly and dangerous predicament.

    Four months after Jyllands-Posten (JP), Denmark's most widely read morning paper, published 12 anti-Islamic cartoons, Danes woke up to the fact that there is a very high price to be paid for promoting the "clash of civilizations."

    The fact that the editors behind the anti-Islamic images claim to be exercising free speech while refusing to address Europe's strict censorship laws regarding discussion of the Holocaust and the ongoing imprisonment of historical revisionists reveals the existence of a more sinister agenda behind the provocative cartoons.

    "Agents of certain persuasion" are behind the egregious affront to Islam in order to provoke Muslims, Professor Mikael Rothstein of the University of Copenhagen told the BBC. The key "agent" is Flemming Rose, the cultural editor of JP, who commissioned cartoonists to produce the blasphemous images and then published them in Denmark's leading morning paper last September.

    The International Herald Tribune, which reported on the offensive cartoons on January 1, noted that even the liberalism of Rose had its limits when it came to criticism of Zionist leaders and their crimes. Rose also has clear ties to the Zionist Neo-Cons behind the "war on terror."

    Rose told the international paper owned by The New York Times that "he would not publish a cartoon of Israel's Ariel Sharon strangling a Palestinian baby, since that could be construed as 'racist.'" [...]

    Rose traveled to Philadelphia in October 2004 to visit Daniel Pipes, the Neo-Con ideologue who says the only path to Middle East peace will come through a total Israeli military victory. Rose then penned a positive article about Pipes, who compares "militant Islam" with fascism and communism.

    In April 2003, President George W. Bush nominated the rabid anti-Muslim Pipes to the board of the United States Institute of Peace, a congressionally sponsored think tank

  • More background
.....| Posted at 10:14 | PERMA-LINK |



      Zionist neocon endorsing Jew behind Mohammed cartoon:


      Rumsfeld says military force option against Iran for Israel





      February 5/6 2006 -- [b]Neo-cons use Denmark as their latest tool to bring about the "Clash of Civilizations." [/b]Denmark is at the center of the ongoing neo-con plot to bring about a bloody military confrontation between the West and Islam. This "Clash of Civilizations" is a hallmark of the neo-con philosophy and is most exemplified in the writings of Prof. Samuel Huntington and Daniel Pipes.

      This follows a pattern of neo-con activity designed to ratchet up tensions. The latest example was the rapid spread of arson across France and Belgium involving neo-Nazis, skinheads, and false flag agents that was blamed entirely on Muslims upset about the deaths of two Muslim youths in a northern Paris suburb. French Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy stoked the flames with his rhetoric about Muslim "scum" just as Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen defended the publication of cartoons depicting the Prophet Mohammed in an offensive manner in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten as a freedom of speech issue.

      Rasmussen, who is one of George W. Bush's leading supporters in the war in Iraq (Denmark has sent several hundreds troops), governs with the support of the neo-fascist, xenophobic, and inappropriately-named Danish "People's Party." After riots in Arhus, Denmark (at the same time as the arson attacks spread across France, Belgium, and a few German cities), other newspapers in the West began publishing the same cartoons. Danish embassies in Damascus and Beirut have now been set on fire and tensions (and terrorist alerts) have been raised in many countries where the cartoons have been republished. Coffee mugs, T-shirts, and key chains are now being sold on the Internet depicting the offensive images. Cui bono? Who benefits? These tactics, of course, are very convenient for the neo-cons.

      Neo-con media outlets such as The New York Sun, Fox News, and others are having a field day with the Muslim riots that have spread around the world in protest over the cartoons just as they had with the French "Muslim" arson attacks. Two New Zealand papers -- The Dominion Post in Wellington and The Press in Christchurch, have published their own controversial cartoons of Mohammed. The papers are owned by Australia's Fairfax Group, which also owns Melbourne's Age, and which was once financially connected to indicted neo-con Lord Conrad Black's scandal-ridden Hollinger publishing empire, which also includes arch neo-con Richard Perle. The Fairfax Group generally adheres to the neo-con corporatist party line.

      The neo-cons ignore and even relish in the offensive nature of the inflammatory cartoons depicting Mohammed as a bomb throwing terrorist and pedophile. Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell have made similar comments about the Prophet that Muslims consider blasphemous. What would the neo-cons say if newspapers published cartoons showing a shady looking Moses stealing gold and silver artifacts from the Pharaoh's palace before high tailing it across the Red Sea in the middle of the night? Or a wine-drunk Jesus cavorting with prostitutes in the red light district of Jerusalem? There is no doubt that rabbis and evangelical preachers would be calling for the heads of the offending cartoonists and editors. They've done so for far less.

      Moses: "I grabbed ten of the Pharaoh's best urns. I have a list here." Jesus: "I've got the wine. Where are the Jerusalem girls?" See why Muslims are so outraged by unflattering cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed? The neo-cons relish in constant religious warfare, which they have now re-coined "the Long War."

      With so many hotheads in the three Abrahamic tradition religions (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam), such inflammatory speech is like yelling fire in a crowded movie theater. The Danish Prime Minister is wrong when he states that the offensive cartoons are protected speech. He would certainly not defend someone who yelled fire in a crowded Copenhagen theater. And struggling Danish farmers, bakers, and fishermen will now pay the price for the boycott of Danish exports by Muslim countries. Lego stockholders will suffer from a boycott of the toy company's products.

      But Rasmussen, like Sarkozy, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Netanyahu, Jack Straw, and Australia's John Howard, is marching to the martial music of the neo-cons. They are the shock troops for the Clash of Civilizations, Project for a New American Century, The Long War, A Clean Break, and all the other neo-con plots, conspiracies, and contrivances. It's clearly time to investigate the neo-cons, their networks, their funding sources, their media ownership and investments, their doctrines, their false flag terrorist operations, and their political contributions. Just as Islamist terrorists, they should be rounded up as dangerous members of society and detained until they no longer pose a threat to public safety and the global commonwealth.


      The Danish newspaper concerned has a history. See http://logicvoice.blogspot.com/2006/02/danish-newspaper-with-history.html

      In 2003 the paper refused to print cartoons of Jesus, saying they would cause offence. In 2001, the newspaper published a list of almost 5000 immigrants to Denmark. Almost exclusively Muslims.

      Just saw the following at www.whatreallyhappened.com

      Russian MP Says US To Attack Iran Late March


      Rumsfeld says military force option against Iran for Israel


      It's great to know who was behind this, but what are their real motives?

      Many 'leaders' and the press are already using this a means to build a stronger self-censorship system.

      The best kind of censorship is the one that is automatic, wherein people are afraid to speak what is obvious to a logical mind.

      For example, how many people will come out and say that the holocost numbers are exaggerated? -Very few, yet the facts for the numbers often quoted, if one bothers to look, don't add up.

      Popular opinion in the case of the holocost doesn't appear to be reality. Yet how can popular opinion be changed if people are too frightened to speak what they think? Without challenge (right or wrong), there is stagnation and many truths wait in the dark.

      This cartoon maybe an attack on muslems, but so what. (and I say 'maybe an attack' because I haven't seen it and I cannot stand in judgement of things I haven't seen)

      What I am seeing is a lot of angry talk that is already leading to more self-censorship. If we go against people who speak their minds, where is it leading us?

      If we can't print a cartoon lampooning a person or even an entire culture, it is a step away from being able to speak our minds.

      In another light, this cartoon can be seen as a window into the minds of people, both the attackers and the victims. And such a window is an opportunity for real learning.

      To quote Professor Chomsky (who is jewish but pro-palistinian and not a zionist)

      "[Hitler's propaganda minister]Goebbels was in favor of free speech for views he liked. So was Stalin. If you're really in favor of free speech, then you're in favor of freedom of speech for precisely for views you despise. Otherwise, you're not in favor of free speech."


      Pipes uses the standard Zionist diversion tactic of 'conspiracy theory' as I have heard that one going all the way back to Israel's deliberate attack on the USS Liberty...

      http://www.ussliberty.com and http://www.ussliberty.org






      Juggernaut Gathering
      Momentum, Headed For Iran


      How to prevent another 9/11


      Even David Duke weighs in to confirm that it wasn't a matter of free speech:

      Danish Paper Cancels Plans to Print Cartoons Critical of Israel


      Zionist Neocon 'War of Civilizations' behind Mohammed cartoon:


      It has been planned for many years; just look at Albert Pike in his descriptions of all the World Wars...WWIII is to stir the religions into annihilation, to make it easier for a One World solution to come in as a false Saviour. Hegel wins again.

      Subject: Anti-Muslim Cartoons Tied to Neo-Con Fanatic

      Understanding the Roots of the Anti-Muslim Cartoon Scandal
      From the Feb. 20th, 2006 American Free Press, Volume VI #8

      by Christopher Bollyn

      The mainstream media coverage of the anti?Islamic cartoons ignores the fact that the publication of the images was a "calculated offense" commissioned by a Danish colleague of the neo?con ideologue Daniel Pipes and was meant to incite violence and promote the "clash of civilizations."

      After Danish embassies in three Muslim nations were attacked and set alight by angry mobs protesting the anti?Islamic cartoons published in a Danish newspaper the mainstream media turned its attention to the controversial images and the violent reactions they provoked. Invariably, however, the controlled press overlooked the important fact that the offensive images were commissioned and published by a Danish colleague of the neo?conservative extremist Daniel Pipes.

      The anti?Muslim cartoon scandal has turned out to be a major step forward for the Zionist neo?cons and their longplanned "clash of civilizations," the artificially constructed conflict designed to pit the so?called Christian West against the Islamic world.

      "The rioting that has erupted across the Middle East . . . is a predictable if overwrought reaction to what now seems like a calculated offense against Islam," The Miami Herald wrote in its lead editorial on Feb. 7.

      "It is not necessary to reprint the offending cartoons for U.S. readers to understand the issue," The Miami Herald, a Knight?Ridder paper. "A religious taboo was violated, and those involved knew full well what they were doing. The incident fell all too neatly into the hands of those who would exacerbate tensions between Europe and the Muslim world."

      Flemming Rose, the cultural editor of ]yllands?Posten (JP), is the person who commissioned and published the offensive cartoons knowing that the images would exacerbate tensions between Europe and the Islamic nations.

      Rose is a colleague of the neo?con Pipes who visited the Philadelphia office of Pipes' Zionist web site called Middle East Forum in 2004.

      Rose then penned a sympathetic article about Pipes entitled "The Threat from Islamism," which promoted his extreme anti?Islamic views without mentioning the fact that Pipes is a rabid Zionist extremist.

      Pipes, the son of the Polish?born Jewish neo?con profes­sor Richard E. Pipes, is a Zionist of the most extreme sort, who says that the Palestinian people need to have a "change of heart" that should be brought about after being utterly defeated by the Israeli military.

      "How is a change of heart achieved? It is achieved by an Israeli victory and a Palestinian defeat," Pipes said in 2003. "The Palestinians need to be defeated even more than Israel needs to defeat them."

      After three Danish embassies were attacked by angry Muslim mobs, CNN turned to Pipes, its carefully chosen Middle East analyst, to explain the cause of the widespread anger in the Muslim world. Rather than discuss the origin of the anti?Muslim images, which had provoked the protests, Pipes blamed radical clerics for having circulated the offensive images.

      CNN failed to mention that Pipes and Rose are Zionist neo?con colleagues while Pipes blamed Muslims for the violent protests, saying that "extremists" had used the offensive cartoons published by Rose "to rally their people and become more agitatedly anti?Western."

      While there have been massive protests throughout the Muslim world against Denmark for the offense against Islam, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, with Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni by her side, blamed Syria and Iran for the violent protests in Damascus and Tehran.

      "Iran and Syria have gone out of their way to inflame sentiments and to use this to their own purposes," Rice said. "And the world ought to call them on it."

      In an article entitled "Cartoons and Islamic Imperialism," written as the Danish embassies smoldered, Pipes framed the "key issue at stake in the battle over the 12 Danish cartoons.

      "Will the West stand up for its customs and mores, including freedom of speech, or will Muslims impose their way of life on the West? Ultimately, there is no compromise," Pipes wrote. "Westerners will either retain their civilization, including the right to insult and blaspheme, or not."

      Repeated questions to Rose, Pipes, and the editors of JP about whether Europeans should also have the right to "insult and blaspheme" the Zionist version of the Holocaust went unanswered.

      During the last decade, there have been several thousand people fined and hundreds put in European prisons for having written or spoken about the Holocaust or Jewish related affairs in a manner deemed illegal.

      Framing the cartoon scandal in this way and forcing a false choice between defending the "free press" or the Muslim protesters, Pipes reveals his hidden hand behind the publication of the cartoons, which now appears to be a well?laid trap into which a number of newspapers and populist parties have fallen.

      There is also a clear connection between the publication of the anti?Muslim cartoons and the secretive Bilderberg group.

      Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the Danish prime minister and frequent Bilderberg attendee, for example, has refused to issue a format apology, which would cost Denmark nothing but could save the nation from further losses to its exporting business and national prestige. Denmark has lost significant market share in Muslim nations due to a consumer boycott of Danish products.

      The damage caused to Denmark's image, prestige and economy is likely to be severe and long lasting. Danish lives are also clearly endangered.

      Rasmussen's refusal to apologize, however, suggests that the "calculated offense," which has led to increased tension between Europeans and the Muslim world, was intentional. One would think that Rose, as the person directly responsible for the "calculated offense" to millions of Muslims, would be charged under Europe's anti?racism laws, not to speak of the severe damage his offensive cartoons caused to Denmark and the Danish people.

      Merete Eldrup, the managing director of IP/Politikens Hus, the parent company that owns Jyllands?Posters, is married to Anders Eldrup of Denmark a Bilderberg attendee for the last five years. Eldrup is chairman of Danish Oil and

      Natural Gas.

      “Why should they, the Americans, have trusted us? We were a bunch of Russians, socialist Russians.”
      -- Isser Harel, former head of Mossad, speaking of the unlikely union between America and the Marxist state of Israel

      Iran in Neo-Con Crosshairs:


      ----- Original Message -----

      From: Anony

      Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 8:03 AM

      Subject: [b]THE PIPELINE TO WAR via Daniel Pipes[/b]

      THE PIPELINE TO WAR via Daniel Pipes

      by Barry Chamish

      Feb 2006

      Imagine a dozen cartoons serving the same purpose as Pearl Harbor or Sarajevo, being the final straw that led the planet into world war. Now imagine the cartoons were a staged event, designed purposely to drag us into unimaginable violence. If that is the case, then those who foisted the plot on an unsuspecting world, would be guilty of super-mass-murder.

      And what if the latest candidate for the Attila the Hun award goes to Daniel Pipes? That is precisely what is being claimed throughout the world wide web at this moment. Though you will not be happy with the sources and sites, read them seriously, no matter how much you've been trained to believe they must be lying.

      The world is upside down. Israel's highest-level "friends and allies" are selling us down the river. And our "enemies" may yet become our allies when they realize that Israelis and Jews have been had.

      I personally, am no defender of Islam. I consider it a culture of immense repression. I do, however, believe their sensitivities are being exploited with the goal of creating a world war. In this war, like the last, Jews will be on the front line and will be the biggest losers of all.

      I have long proved that the Council On Foreign Relations (CFR) is intent on getting the war started. To do so, fear and resentment against Islam must be spread persuasively. For that purpose, they have chosen a leading member, Daniel Pipes.

      Too many Jews have fallen for the enemy of my enemy line and believe by fomenting anti-Arab attacks that Daniel Pipes is their ally. In fact, his work has nothing whatsoever to do with defending Israel and a lot to do with involving her in the first line of a world war.

      Pipes is not a "radical" advocate of Israel as his critics believe. He is, in fact, the worst kind of enemy of the Jewish state. It is about time that Israelis and her critics figured out the real game plan.

      And Pipes, sadly, has a few allies working with him to incite Arabs into a frenzy through any means of deceit and deception. The pathetic deeds of his little Israeli adjunct are found at the end of this article.

      Now you decide if, in this vast world, Pipes' direct ties to the Danish editor who first published the cartoons, are mere coincidence:


      Cartoon Madness is an NWO Plot

      By Fintan Dunne, Break ForNews.com 7th February, 2006

      There is evidence of deliberately inflammatory publication by European
      newspapers, and a campaign to inflame Muslims --as well as a deception
      operation to downplay the links between the Danish editor who first
      published the cartoons and leading Neoconservative Daniel Pipes.

      And now here comes Neocon guru Daniel Pipes, weighing into the 'toon madness, to identifying it with the Clash of Civilizations ideaology he professes not to personally espouse. It's now-or-never, "no compromise" language:

      Stand With Denmark in Cartoon Dispute
      by Daniel Pipes Feb 07, 2006

      The key issue at stake in the battle over the twelve Danish cartoons of the Muslim prophet Muhammad is this: will the West stand up for its customs and mores, including freedom of speech, or will Muslims impose their way of life on the West? Ultimately, there is no compromise; Westerners will either retain their civilization, including the right to insult and blaspheme, or not.

      You get the spin, don't you? Europe stands with the Danes. So come time
      to vote on the EU Constitution the Danes must stand with Europe. Slick.
      Even as he takes this stand, Pipes is carefully covering his back against
      journalists uncovering the link between him and Flemming Rose, the
      Danish magazine's cultural editor:

      (Our Emphasis)
      My role in the Danish cartoon affair
      Posted by Daniel Pipes on Feb. 6, 2006
      There's a conspiracy theory developing about myself and Flemming Rose, the Jyllands-Posten cultural editor who published the famous twelve cartoons of the Muslim prophet. I'll begin with the conspiracy theory (but without providing links or even quotes, as I don't want to send readers to these crackpot websites), and then provide the facts.

      The conspiracy theory: Rose came to Philadelphia in October 2004 to see me and we developed a close bond. Then, as a result of this visit, Rose decided to publish the cartoons.

      The facts: Rose visited me in my office on October 25, 2004, when he interviewed me for a feature piece on me that he published on October 29 in Jyllands-Posten. The resulting article, "Truslen fra islamismen," can be found on my website, as can a translation of it into English, "The Threat of Islamism." It was a standard interview in which Rose inquired about my views on a variety of questions pertaining to radical Islam. It contains, for example, my signature statement, translated into Danish: "Hvis militant islam er problemet, så må modsætningen, moderat islam, være løsningen." Flemming Rose and I have not written, spoken, or seen each other since that one meeting. I had nothing to do with the decision to commission or publish the cartoons eleven months later and only learned of their existence from press coverage of them. http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/166

      That's called getting your denial in first --even before any mainstream
      media get hold of this angle. Isn't it sooooo fortunate that someone
      has written a "conspiracy theory" article on this very sensitive issue, and
      published it on what Pipes ironically calls "crackpot websites."
      So, when/if any journalist approaches Pipes on this issue, he can laugh it
      off as "old news" and "crackpot conspiracy theory." Which is a vitally
      convenient smokescreen --because there is a clear connection and a
      commonality of interests between Pipes and the Danish editor.
      In the BreakForNews.com Forum, poster CaptainW draws another link
      --this time to the Bildebergers:

      What is not being mentioned in the Media is that the Editor of the Danish Paper has links to both US Neocons & The Bilderbergers...
      MERETE ELDRUP, managing director of company that published the cartoons (JP/Politikens Hus) is married to ANDERS ELDRUP, who has attended the last FIVE Bilderberg meetings.

      Link http://breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=53
      Coincidentally Pipes has just decided to drag up all his best conspiracy
      material in a new "best of" revisiting of the issue on Feb 2nd:

      Bibliography - Conspiracy Theories
      Posted by Daniel Pipes on February 2, 2006
      With the conspiracist mindset seemingly on the perpetual rise these years, I thought it useful to gather my various writings on this topic in a single place, to be updated as needed. http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/575
      And who had so conveniently provided Pipes with this smokescreen?
      We warned you about this guy:

      Cartoons are a purposeful provocation
      American Free Press
      Rose traveled to Philadelphia in October 2004 to visit Daniel Pipes, the Neo-Con ideologue who says the only path to Middle East peace will come through a total Israeli military victory. Rose then penned a positive article about Pipes, who compares "militant Islam" with fascism and communism.

      The editor of Jyllands Posten who ordered the publication of the cartoons is Flemming Rose, who has extensive connections to Daniel Pipes, another neocon fascist madman who runs Campus Watch, a neo-McCarthyite witch-hunting organization which vilifies American professors who criticize Israel or show sympathy for the Palestinians. President Bush wanted to name Daniel Pipes to the board of the US Institute of Peace, a government-funded arm of the State Department which organizes conferences and publishes books. When the raving extremist Pipes turned out to be too widely discredited to obtain Senate confirmation for this post, Bush forced his nomination through with a summer 2003 recess appointment to a temporary term at USIP without Senate approval. Daniel Pipes is the nepotist son of Richard Pipes, a Sovietologist who was a leading figure in George H.W. Bush's 1976 Team B, the incubator of today's neocon clique. At the time of his recess appointment, Daniel Pipes was accused by the very moderate Arab-American Institute of "hatred and bigotry" in the context of his "bizarre obsession with all things Arab and Muslim." (http://www.aaiusa.org/pr/release08-14-03.htm) This is the sick, racist point of view embraced by Jyllands Posten.
      Flemming Rose provided details of his conversation with Daniel Pipes in a later article. They talked about the need to mobilize Europe for the war of civilizations against the Moslem world. Rose wrote: "Pipes is surprised that there isn't greater alarm in Europe over the challenge that Islam represents thanks to falling rates of fertility and a weakened sense for its own history and culture." (Flemming Rose, "The Threat from Islamism, Jyllands-Posten, October 29, 2004)

      How long have I warned that when the war comes to Israel's "settlers," it will be vicious, cruel and fought largely by anti-semitic troops imported into the country for the purpose of inflicting the kind of violence any moral Jew would find too appalling to enact?

      Here is today's report about Amona last Wednesday:

      One girl was picked up by a policeman and held up high against a wall, while the other policeman shoved his club up her vagina.

      "How do I know it is true?" the young man telling the story echoed his mother's question. [I told her that I needed to know how the stories she told me yesterday were true, what the sources were.]

      "Because my friend just came from her house. The girl is hysterical. She has locked herself in her bedroom. She won't come out, she's screaming and wailing, her family is hysterical, their friends can't find a way to comfort them, can't get her to come out or to talk to anybody. She's screaming and won't come out.

      Another girl was grabbed by two riot policemen who were shoving her into a paddywagon. One held her flat on her back at the edge of the paddywagon and held her legs spread open, and the other policeman rammed his club up her vagina so hard and so far that the whole club was inside of her, up to his fist.

      2 boys lost an eye --
      1 is being flown to huz'laretz to try to save his eye. I'm not sure if he is one of the 2, or a 3rd boy.
      4 girls have no womb anymore
      40 serious head injuries
      20 boys whose testicles were crushed so badly that they don't know if they can save them.
      3 of those 20 for sure are permanently ruined, they will never be able to father children.

      Following are two reports confirming the use of foreign troops. The first is from former Prisoner of Zion, Ida Nudel.

      Barry, shalom!
      Yesterday, Russian language's TV by name RTVi in its Saturday's evening program
      At 21.00. show an interview with a young man by name Eliahu Levin.
      Mr. Levin was standing on a roof of one of houses in Amona. When people of the army and police came up to clean the roof and began pushing and attacking those who stayed there, among them Levin noted one looking as Russian. Levin told him in Russian language:"Brother, we should be on the same side",
      The man in Israeli uniform answered in a proper Russian: "I am not your brother, jidovsky morda (in slang - face)
      Nobody had an identification tags on the uniform.
      The station RTVi has internet site
      HYPERLINK "http://www.RTVi"

      The Caricatures in Middle East Politics

      James Petras and Robin Eastman-Abaya

      February 19, 2006

      The center piece of the current explosive confrontation between Islamic and Arab protestors, political leaders and governments and the US and Western European regimes and publishers is rooted in Israeli efforts to polarize the world in its favor and to promote isolation, economic sanctions and/or a military attack on Iran. There are several key questions, which almost all commentators and analysts have failed to address. These include: Why did the “cartoons” get published in Denmark?
      What is the political background of “Flemming Rose” the cultural editor of Jyllands-Posten, who solicited, selected and published the cartoons?
      What larger issues coincide with the timing of the cartoons publication and reproduction?
      Who “benefits” from the publication of the cartoons and the ensuing confrontation between the Arabs/Islam and the West?
      What is the contemporary political context of the Arab/Islam protests?
      How is the Israeli secret service, Mossad, implicated in provoking the Western-Islamic/Arab conflict, and how do the consequences measure up to their expectations?

      A starting point for analyzing the cartoon controversy, which has been a focus for attacking Muslims and Muslim countries as intolerant of Western ‘freedom of expression’ is the long-standing role of Denmark as a major operation point for Mossad activity in Europe. Re-phrased: How could a tiny Scandinavian country of 5.4 citizens and residents (200,000 or less than 3% of whom are Muslim), renowned for fairy tales, ham and cheese, have become a target for the fury of millions of practicing Muslims from Afghanistan to Palestine, from Indonesia to Libya and into the streets of cities all over the world with significant Muslim populations? Why, after the bombing of Baghdad, the tortures of Abu Ghariab, the massacres in Fallujah and the utter destitution of the entire Iraqi and Afghan people…would Moslems turn their anger at symbols of Denmark from its tinned cookies to its Embassies and overseas business offices?

      The story, presented with straight faces, by television news-people, is of, Mr. ‘Flemming Rose’, a crusading cultural editor of a widely read Danish daily newspaper who wanted to counter the growing ‘political correctness’ of Europeans about criticizing Moslems and which he compared to the ‘self-censorship’ he had witnessed in his native Soviet Union. The oddly named Ukrainian-born editor of the culture page of the Jyllands-Posten commissioned Danish cartoonists to submit a series of cartoons depicting the Prophet Mohammed as they (the Danish cartoonists) might imagine him. However four of the twelve cartoons selected for publication were illustrated by ‘Rose’s’ own staff including the most controversial ‘bomb in the turban’ one. Braving Denmark’s anti-blasphemy laws Mr. Rose published the cartoons on September 30, 2005 and the rest is history…

      A huge world wide attack on the West’s “sacred right to free expression” erupted in the Moslem world with millions of shocked Europeans and North Americans rushing to defend their cherished freedoms in this ‘clash of civilizations’. Syria and Iran were prominently blamed for the stirring up of furious believers in the streets of Damascus and Teheran, Beirut and in the slums of Gaza. According to US Secretary Rice, "Iran and Syria have gone out of their way to inflame sentiments and to use this to their own purposes and the world ought to call them on it." The Pakistani and Libyan authorities allied to the US fired on demonstrators killing and wounding scores while numerous religious leaders were arrested. The Western governments urged their Arab and Moslem allies to prevent more attacks on Danish products and property and blamed those unable to quell the fury with complicity and instigation. All of this was over a series of cartoons, or so we are told.
      The cultural editor, ‘Flemming Rose’, who soon tired of being surrounded by a team of Danish police and security to protect him from assassination and missing his daily jogs through his tranquil Copenhagen neighborhood, chose to seek safe haven in Miami, Florida (rather than his native Ukraine) among the Cuban exiles, Israeli sayanim*(see footnote) and Mah Jong-playing retirees as the drama plays on.
      Denmark Center of Mossad Activity
      Why Denmark? Could this crudely manufactured controversy have been generated on the pages of any major London or New York paper? Who would wish to put Denmark at the center of this ‘clash of civilization’ – appearing as a script from some grade B Islamophobic thriller?

      An interesting chapter in former Israeli Mossad agent, Victor J. Ostrovsky’s book, By Way of Deception (1990 St. Martin’s Press), outlines the close relationship between the workings of the Danish intelligence services and the Israeli Mossad over decades:
      “The relationship between the Mossad and Danish intelligence is so intimate as to be indecent. But it is not the Mossad’s virtue that is compromised by the arrangement; it’s Denmark’s. And that’s because the Danish are under the mistaken impression that because they saved a lot of Jews in World War II, the Israelis are grateful and they can trust the Mossad.”
      The Mossad has the capacity to monitor the entire population of Arabs and especially Palestinians (presumably including those with Danish citizenship) through their special relations with the Danes:
      “…a Mossad man monitors “all Arabic and Palestinian-related messages(among Denmarks Arab community) coming into their (the Danish Civil Security Service)headquarters…an extraordinary arrangement for a foreign intelligence service.”
      The Danish Intelligence officers’ high regard for their Israeli Mossad office mates is apparently not, according to Ostrovsky, reciprocated:
      “The Mossad have such contempt for their Danish counterparts that they refer to them as ‘fertsalach’, the Hebrew term for a small burst of gas, a fart…they tell the Mossad everything they do.” Pp. 231-232
      In return for their servility, the Danes get valuable ‘training’ from the Israelis:
      Once every three years, Danish intelligence officials go to Israel for a seminar conducted by the Mossad”… which generates useful contacts for the Mossad “while perpetuating the notion that no organization deals with terrorism better than they (Mossad) do.”

      In the wake of the US debacle in Iraq and the world’s resistance to a massive ‘preemptive military attack’ or economic and diplomatic embargo of Iran, which could send oil prices to over $100 a barrel, Israel needed to turn the war of ideas on its head. It would make sense that a campaign, aimed to further whip up justifications to attack countries like Iran and Syria (Israel’s current enemy du jour), would emanate from one of the US strongest European ally in the invasion and destruction of Iraq and Afghanistan and whose national intelligence apparatus (so fondly known as ‘fertsalach’) would be eager to serve Israel’s interest.

      Flemming ( or Flaming) Rose: Journalist with a cause
      Given Mossad’s long-standing penetration of the Danish intelligence agencies, and their close working relations with the right wing media, it is not surprising that
      a Ukranian Jew, operating under the name of “Flemming Rose” with close working relations with the Israeli state (and in particular the far right Likud regime) should be the center of the controversy over the cartoons. “Rose’s” ties to the Israeli state antedate his well-know promotional “interview” with Daniel Pipes (2004), the notorious Arab-hating Zionist ideologue. Prior to being placed as a cultural editor of a leading right-wing Danish daily, from 1990 to 1995 “Rose” was a Moscow-based reporter who translated into Danish a self-serving auto-biography by Boris Yeltsin, godchild of the pro-Israeli, post-communist Russian oligarchs, most of whom held dual citizenship and collaborated with the Mossad in laundering illicit billions. Between 1996-1999 “Rose”, the journalist, worked the Washington circuit (traveling with Clinton to China) before returning to Moscow 1999-2004 as a reporter for Jyllands-Posten. In 2005 he became its cultural editor, despite few or any knowledge of the field and over the head of other Danish journalists on the staff. In his new position “Rose” found a powerful platform to incite and play on the growing hostility of conservative Danes to immigrants from the Middle East, particularly practicing Moslems. Using the format of an ‘interview’ he published Pipes’ virulent anti-Islamic diatribe, probably to “test the waters” before proceeding to the next stage in the Mossad strategy to polarize a West-East confrontation.
      Political Context for Action
      There is a great body of evidence demonstrating that Iraq war was largely a result of a massive disinformation campaign by civilian militarists in the Pentagon and US Zionists in and out of high places in the Pentagon and civil society, in coordination with the Israeli state, which wanted Iraq to be destroyed as a viable nation. There is no evidence that the major US oil corporations pressured Congress or promoted the war in Iraq or the current confrontation with Iran. There is plenty of evidence that they are very uneasy about the losses that may result from an Israeli attack on Iran.
      The Zionist succeeded in their goals in Iraq: establishing a beachhead in the northern Kurdish enclave (‘Kurdistan’), and securing assets in the new “Iraqi” regime via Chalabi and others.
      The major Jewish organizations mobilized to oppose any critics of the Zionist policymakers, predictably accusing them of ‘anti-Semitism’. Nevertheless, over time, FBI investigations, CIA reports and judicial indictments have pointed to key Israeli operatives and their domestic collaborators as Israeli spies. While Israel benefited from the Bush-Blair invasion in Iraq, the same cannot be said for the United States. As thousands of casualties mounted, and war spending skyrocketed to hundreds of billions of dollars, opposition to the war escalated.
      Israeli strategic plans to extend US military operations to Iran and Syria faced major challenges, from within the US military and public and even sections of the mass media. Mossad assets in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and elsewhere had to settle for puff pieces on Iran’s non-existent nuclear weapon threat, right after the same plot with regard to Iraq was exposed as a total fabrication. Another line of propaganda was needed to silence war critics and heighten animosities to the Islamists/Arabs in general and Iran in particular. This is where the “Flemming Rose”-Mossad operation came into the picture. The Islamic-hate cartoons were published in Denmark in September 2005 as Israeli and US Zionists escalated their war propaganda against Iran. The initial response from the Islamic countries however was limited. The story wasn’t picked up in the International Herald Journal until late December 2005. By early January 2006, Mossad “Katsas” (Hebrew for case officers) activated sayanim (volunteer Jewish collaborators outside of Israel) throughout Western and Eastern European media to simultaneously reproduce the cartoons on Feb. 1 and 2, 1006. One such sayanim operation would have been the decision by France-Soir Senior Editor, Arnaud Levy and Editor in Chief Serge Faubert, to publish the cartoons. The paper’s French Egyptian owner almost immediately fired the paper’s Managing Editor, Jacques Lefranc, who, according to an interview with CNN, had initially opposed their publications, without touching Levy and Faubert.
      A strident campaign was launched in practically all the pro-Western mass media condemning the initial, relatively moderate Islamic protests, which had occurred between September to December 2005 and rapidly provoked the subsequent massive escalation, doubtlessly aided by covert Mossad operatives among Arab populations. Mossad’s ‘little farts’, the Danish intelligence fanned the fires by advising Denmark’s rightwing Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen not to give way by refusing to apologize as the pro-Western Arab regimes requested and even refusing a request for a meeting with a group of Denmark-based diplomats from Arab and Moslem countries to discuss the ‘situation’.
      “Flemming Rose”-Mossad tried one more gambit – to further heighten East-West tension. He publicly offered to publish any Iranian cartoons which would mock the Holocaust in ‘his’ paper’. The senior editor of Jyllands-Posten, apparently belatedly caught on to “Flemming Rose” hidden agenda and vetoed the ‘offer’ and asked Rose to take a leave of absence. Rose left for Miami, not Tel Aviv – where his residency might raise suspicions about his claim to be merely an opponent of “self-censorship”. In Miami, he no doubt will have the protection of the locally based sayanin, armed and train for “self-defense” of threatened Zionists.
      Sayanim – Defenders of Western Civilization
      The sayanim, derived, according to Victor Ostrovsky, from the Hebrew word ‘to help’ are a huge world-wide network of Jews in strategic or useful places (real estate, mass media, finance, car dealerships etc…) who have been agreed to help in Israeli Mossad actitivies within their own countries. This has been ascribed to the supra-national loyalty sayanim offer to Israel, above and not always in the interest of their home country. According to Gordon Thomas and Martin Dillon, in their detailed biography, Robert Maxwell, Israel’s Superspy (Carroll and Graf Publishers, 2002), the notorious media mogul, Robert Maxwell, was a super-sayanim, providing cover, offices, political connections, money-laundering services and planted stories in the service of Israel at the Mossad’s beheast. Jonathan Pollard, the American Naval Researcher jailed for espionage, is another notorious sayanim. The activities of these ‘helpers’ really range from the spectacular to the more mundane and, according to Victor Ostrovsky, in his 1990 biography By Way of Deception, the sayanim represent a pool of thousands of active and inactive individuals who can provide services discretely out of loyalty to ‘the cause of Israel’ as defined by any current Mossad operation. The cynicism of this arrangement is clear: It makes little difference to the Mossad if an operation, such as ‘Flemming Rose’, jeopardizes the national and economic interests of the sayanim’s own country and , if exposed, might harm the status of Jews in the diaspora. The standard response from the Mossad would be: “So what’s the worst that could happen to those Jews? They’s all come to Israel? Great.” This recklessness clearly has ramifications for Jews who have refused to be recruited as Mossad helpers in affected countries.

      Mossad War Propaganda and the “Cartoon Controversy”
      Israeli leaders expressed their opposition to the Bush Administration’s diplomatic efforts to engage the European powers in the Iran negotiations. Automatically and without question all the major Zionist and Jewish organizations in the US (AIPAC, Presidents of the Major Jewish Organizations, ADL and others) unleashed a sustained national campaign to mobilize congress and their “friends” in the executive branch to take immediate military action or to impose economic sanctions on Iran. The Bush Administration however while in agreement, lacked public support in the US and among his European allies and their national electorates. The Mossad policy was to create a pretext to polarize public opinion between the Middle East (and beyond) and the West in order to escalate tensions and demonize Islamic adversaries to its Middle East hegemonis pretensions. “Rose” cartoons served the Mossad perfectly. The issue could be presented as a free speech issue, a conflict of “values” not “interests”, between the “democratic West” and the fundamentalist “totalitarian” (as characterized by Pipes-Rose) Islamists. Nothing could be further from the truth. Rose had solicited and selected the Islamic caricatures while his paper had rejected similar cartoons of Jesus Christ in an earlier context. The image of Rose as a “cultural iconoclast” - while working for a right wing daily whose daily fare was publishing anti-(Mid-East)immigrant “news stories” and favorable interviews with Zionists extremists - is prima facie not credible, although that image has been purveyed by all the major media outlets. While “Rose” initiated the international tensions, liberal and neo-con colleagues and his comrades in and out of the Mossad publicized his transgressions and provoked the ire of the Arab and Islamic world.
      The cartoons, the subsequent insults and calumnies attacking the Islamic protestors and their secular allies throughout Africa, the Middle East, Asia and Europe eventually provoked major peaceful and then violent protests by millions of people. Visual images of violent protests and demonstrations were featured by the Western mass media, successfully creating the intended fear and apprehension against Muslim countries and minorities in Europe. Islamophobia gained momentum. Zionist propagandists in Europe and the US linked the defense of “free speech” issue to Israeli “security” policies. While the West turned its fury against the Islamic protestors, Israel blockaded Gaza and the US and Europe cut off all funding to the Palestinians, threatening the population with mass starvation for exercising its democratic right to elect its own leaders! “Rose’s” free speech charade revived the discredited ZionCon doctrine of “Clash of Civilizations”. Playing on European Islamophobia and the increasing sensibility of practicing Moslems and Arab nationalists to Western abuses, it is likely that Israeli psych-war experts pinpointed the “free speech” issue as the ideal detonator for the conflict.
      The democratic electoral victory of Hamas – dubbed by Israel as a terrorist movement – accelerated Israeli efforts to convince Western governments to insist that regimes in Muslim countries repress the ‘irrational Islamic masses’ or face Western censure or elimination of aid. (The failure to crack down violently on demonstrators was presented by the media as official approval or instigation) The major US Zionist organizations were able to influence Secretary of State Rice into blaming Iran and Syria for fomenting the worldwide demonstrations, from Gaza to the Philippines. The Israeli strategy was to use European outrage to weaken opposition to a military attack or economic sanctions on Iran and Syria.
      Beyond Religious Blasphemy
      While most establishment analysts have narrowly focused on the cartoon as the source and target of the massive global demonstrations, in fact it is at best the immediate detonator of a whole series of ongoing events of much greater political significance. From the “shock and awe” carpet bombing of Iraq, to the mass torture and routine everyday humiliation in occupied countries, from the utter destruction of Fallujah (an American example as Guernica was for the Nazis), to Israeli devastation of Jenin and Palestine, from the everyday assassinations of Palestinians by the Israeli occupiers, to the smearing of the Koran with filth at Guantanamo, Israel, the US and Europe have attempted to demonstrate that no Moslems are safe anywhere- not in their schools, home, offices, fields, factories or mosques- and that nothing is sacred.
      The reasons that millions are demonstrating against a caricature of Mohammed published in an insignificant Scandinavian rightwing newspaper is that this is the last straw – the detonator – of a series of deliberate violations of fundamental social and political rights of Muslim, Arab and colonized peoples. While the Western media have focused exclusively on the religious content of the demonstrators, almost every country, where massive sustained demonstrations have taken place, has been subject to recent Western intervention, large-scale pillage of raw materials and/or experienced the destruction of their secular rights: countries invaded, homes, schools, hospital, systems of health and clean water demolished, agriculture and natural resources looted, museums, libraries and archeological sites pillaged and mosques desecrated. The present condition for material existence has been a Western inferno for all the people (both secular and observant) living in Arab or Islamic countries. Now their most profound, historic, spiritual reference point, the prophet Mohammed – the most cherished religious figure – has been repeatedly trampled with impunity by arrogant imperialists, their media servants, aided and abetted by the Israeli state and its overseas ‘sayanin’ operatives. It is cynical to suggest that practicing Moslems could desecrate the figure of Jesus Christ with impunity when that too is forbidden by the Koran.
      As the Israeli strategists well knew in advance, the vilification of Islam was not taking place in a political vacuum: The material conditions for an Islamic-Arab uprising were ripe: Hamas had swept the Palestinian elections, the US military were aware that they were losing the war in Iraq, Iran was refusing to capitulate, Bush was losing public support for ongoing and future Middle Eastern wars, AIPAC, Israel’s main political instrument for influencing US policy was under criminal investigation…Israel’s strategy of having the US fight its wars was boomeranging. There was a need to revive the political-military tensions which they had exploited after September 11, 2001 to Israel’s advantage: hence the “Flemming Rose” provocation, hence the coordinated, wide promotion of the act, hence the free speech agitation among Western ‘sayanin’, liberals, conservatives and neocon ideologues, hence the predictable explosion of protest, hence the ‘recreation’ of Mid-East tension…and the advances of Israel’s agenda.
      Clearly the burgeoning confrontation is more than a religious or free speech issue, more than the crude provocations of an errant cultural editor coddled by the ‘little farts’ of a penetrated Danish intelligence agency. What is at stake is the deliberate racist stereotyping of Arab, Islamic and Third World people in order to sustain and deepen their oppression, exploitation and subordination.
      The most pervasive, prolific and influential source of racist Arab stereotypes are Israel and its overseas (particularly US and European) academics, terror ‘experts’, psychologists at the most prestigious universities and think tanks, who have provided the “psychological profile” to torture, humiliate, provoke and repress the millions struggling for self-determination against colonial and imperial dominance.
      Once again Israel and especially its overseas operatives have placed the expansion and militarist interests of Israel above the interests of the people of the US and Europe. “Is it good for the Jews?”: A criterion as defined by the Israeli state, has led to the blind alley of massive confrontations, deepening animosity between Arabic/Muslim peoples and Western regimes. What appeared so clever to the ‘Roses’ of the world and their Katsas and docile Sayanim, in provoking confrontation may once again boomerang: The uprisings may go beyond protesting symbols of vilification to attacking the substance of power, including the Arab and Moslem pro-consuls and collaborators of the Euro-American political and economic power. While the Mossad is very astute in infiltrating and provoking oppressed groups, it has been singularly inept in controlling and containing the resultant uprisings as the recent victory of Hamas demonstrates and the success of the Iraqi resistance illustrates. The next controversial cartoon may show Moses leading his people into the desert.
      While the Mossad-provoked ‘free speech versus blasphemy’ controversy between the West and the Islamic peoples continues to deepen, Israel proceeds to impose a Nazi-like economic siege over 4 million Palestinians, intended to starve them into surrendering their democratic freedoms. Intended is the concise term, Gideon Levy, star reporter for the Israeli daily newspaper Haaretz (19/02/06) records Dov Weissglas, advisor to the Israeli Prime Minister, jokingly telling top officials “Its (the economic blockage – which may include electricity and water, as well as food) like an appointment with a dietician. The Palestinians will get a lot thinner but won’t die.” The Israeli officials “rolled with laughter”. As Levy points out “more than half of all Palestinians are already living in poverty…last year 37 had difficulties obtaining food… 54% of the residents of Gaza cut back the amount of food they consume…child mortality rose by 15%…unemployment reached 28%.” Planned pre-meditated mass starvation of a ghettoized population, jokingly discarded by its executioners as a ‘visit to the dietician’, is an exact replica of the internal policy discussion of the Nazi high command over the population in the Warsaw Ghetto. Israel’s capacity to impose and implement a genocidal policy has been greatly facilitated by the symbolic sideshow, which the Mossad-‘Rose’ orchestrated in Western Europe. “Cultural” conflict at the service of genocide – is hardly a clever ruse or merely a violation of Islamic sensibilities, it is a crime against humanity.


      1. Islam regards Mary the mother of Jesus as the best and the most pious wowan. There is an entire chapter in the Quran (Koran) by the name of "Mary", but no chapter by the name of Muhammed's wife or mother or father.

      2. Islam teaches that Christians are the most sympathetic and friendly to them, among all religions.

      3. Islam agrees that Jesus was of noble birth. But the Jews regard him as otherwise.

      4. Islam believes that, the true followers of Jesus loved him so much, they could not tolerate the claims of Jews as given in 3 above. So they were left with no choice, but to invent that Jesus was the Son of God (which the Gospel itself contradicts, even today, if one reads carefully)

      5. Islam believes in the miracles of Jesus. And regard him in high esteem as a Prophet from God. And no one is a muslim until he believes so.

      6. Islam believes that the Gospel, Torah and Paslms were the original words of God (Allah), but later changed by humans, for their own desires.

      7. Muslims believe that Jesus will appear again before the end of this world. They also believe in Anti-Christ (Dhajjaal).

      8. Muslims believe that Jesus was protected by God and taken to heaven but was never crucified. (How can someone crucify him when he was protected by God)

      9. Very pious muslims regard, musical instruments as "Instruments of Sataan"

      10. Muslims denounce intoxicants, gambling, theft, rape, usury (interest, having to pay more if you pay later), disturbing your neighbour and all ill manners.

      11. Muslims do not worship Kaabaa in Mecca, (often termed by Islam haters as "black box in the desert"), but they only take it as a direction to face (for unity, when everyone is facing the same direction). They even stand up on its roof and call for prayer (no one stands on top of his "idol", if that's what the haters like to portray)

      12. Islam teaches that the best muslim is the one who is kindest to the wife. Mother has to be respected and cared for 3 times more than the father (so who says islam is unkind to women)

      13. Islam allows one to marry more than one wife ONLY IF he is able to treat them EQUALLY with regard to food, clothing, shelter etc..(but ofcourse, there could be some difference in what you feel inside the heart, but this is ok). This was allowed because many women were poor, widowed and many men were killed during wars.

      14. Muslims invented Algebra.

      15. Muslims made great advances in Astronomy and their medicine was 1000 years ahead of contemporaries.

      16. Muslims invented surgery.

      17. Muslims built the first University in Europe. When they conquered Spain.

      18. Muslims founded Sociology.

      19. Muslims translated books from ancient Egypt and Greek civilizations and Europe borrowed this knowledge form Muslims, even if they try to conceal it. (and now some are burning the huge libraries in Bagdad)

      20. The army of Anti-Christ will be all Jews, and Christians will convert to Islam when Jesus will descend and preach them.

      21. Persia and Sham (Modern day Iran, Iraq and Syria) will be conquered by non muslims, before the apperance of Anti-Christ, but will be liberated. This is a prophecy of Muhammad.

      22. All prophets had beards (even the statues and paintings of Jesus has a beard). And can't anyone see that even virgin mary has a head scarf (like a "burga") and so do the nuns, even today.

      23. Islam never tolerates injustice and muslims are not cowards. They will not send troops from other countries to fight their war and save their own lives (and politics at home).

      24. Islam is not based on public opinion and muslims only try to please Allah.

      25. Muhammad thaught that "islam came as a strange religion, and will remain so till the end". So we are not surprised.

      26. There is no "extremist" or "Moderate" islam. Islam has only one version and it does not change whether people follow it or not.

      27. When muslims presented the king of France with a pendulum clock, he thought that there was a demon inside the clock driving the clock hands (so much for civilization)

      28. Islam does not permit muslims to live in majority non-muslim countries. So don't blame Jack Straw but blame your own selves.

      29. Muslims once ruled more that a third of the then known world.

      30. Muslims were the first to draw a world map.

      31. When muslim haters speak about islam, they never speak of the great contributions made by muslims in the field of medicine, optics, trignometry, mathematics, astronomy, chemistry (did you know Alchemy, Alkali, Alkanes, Algebra are all arabic names), sociology and many other Sciences. How dare that some people think that they are the only civilized people on earth.
      (Similarly, some people still do not know that the Chinese invented ice-cream and that Basmathi rice comes from India)

      32. How can one wage a war against muslims numbering in the billions. More than a fifth of the worlds population and still growing rapidly.

      Thank you for reading. I think that this clears some of your misconceptions and with internet you could do some serious research as to what Islam is really about. Without blaming it unknowingly.

      Thank you!
      [url=http://xivckiqe.com/acni/lwra.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://hhlncigm.com/otst/zxci.html]Cool site[/url]

      Well done!
      My homepage | Please visit

      Well done!
      http://xivckiqe.com/acni/lwra.html | http://uaqtwskq.com/uzpp/mxco.html


      I am cartoonist Arjun from Ahmedabad-INDIA.Mycartoons are published in Gujarat Samachar / Times of India/ Rajasthan patrika and so many newspaper and magazines in
      INDIA since last 30 years.My age is 48 years.In USA the news paper name: SOUTH ASIAN INSIDER publishedfrom New York, Newjurcy and Washington DC.
      In Canada the news Paper Name Is: GUJARAT ABROADI am also the owner of the company so called-"cartoonzxplored". We are doing Freelancing and outsourcing work of clip arts and animation as well as 3d work, which includes all type of animation right from small animation to the short stories. I want to start comics work for your site.
      .I am sending herewith my work as a sample. Do not use it. It is already sold.
      We specialize in the following areas:
      Areas Current monthly capacity

      Tatoos 250
      Technical Drawings 3000
      Non Technical Drawings 5000
      Static Clipart 5000
      Animated Clipart 5000
      Icons 10000
      Static Cartoon Strips 500
      Animated Cartoon Stories 25
      IN 3D

      Architectural walkthrough AS PER ORDER


      Also we have an in-house team of 20 Sketchers, Computer
      Animators & Graphic Designers and a strong 4 Cartoonist
      Presentably we are catering to 4 US & UK based
      Companies and we do a full time outsourcing job from them
      And are in an expansion phase.
      We would be glad to furnish your requirements in the above
      Areas too. Kindly let us know if you have some general or
      Specialized areas where you need our services. when you
      required any work from our cartoonzxplored.At that time we
      Will discuss about the rates.
      Yours faithfully

      Visit our web site:www.cartoonzxplored.com

      Zionists Manipulate Public Forums on the Internet :

      Zionists Manipulate Public Forums on the Internet :

      Zionists Manipulate Public Forums on the Internet :

      Bolsheviks and British Jews: The Anglo-Jewish Community, Britain and the Russian Revolution

      conspiracy blogs :

      Post a Comment

    referer referrer referers referrers http_referer