TOTAL INFORMATION ANALYSIS

LEAFLETING, NOT PROTESTING, STONE'S 'WTC' FILM - PDFs

Monday, August 21, 2006

Loose Change 2nd Edition Recut released to web

Some notes on this edition relative to earlier versions and current 9/11 research:

An opening disclaimer that the use of copyrighted footage (eg Naudet film) does not imply agreement or permission by the copyright holders.

Spiffy new animation based on satellite imagery.

No mention of the A3 Skywarrior theory for the Pentagon; just a thorough debunking of the Boeing theory.

There is no critical analysis of the Boeing videos. (The first edition explored the pod/flash issue.) But there is a little-seen video of a plane flying into the exploding South tower. It was provided to the filmmakers by the state-owned Canadian Broadcasting Co. through backchannels.

Retains the New York Times articles on the 1975 WTC fire -- exclusively discovered by total911.info in the Library of Congress.

Critical analysis of the phone calls allegedly placed from the alleged flights.

This version still has competent discussion of some relatively esoteric areas of research, such as the airliner landing at the NASA facility in Cleveland and the billions in gold under the World Trade Center.

To illustrate recent 9/11 media breakthroughs, we see U-Wisconsin's Dr. Kevin Barrett on Hannity & Colmes.

The film ends with the C-SPAN footage of and narration by the Loose Change crew's call for a thousands-strong swarm of 9/11 activists in Southern Manhattan on 9/11/2006.

.....---
.....| Posted at 08:17 | PERMA-LINK |

Comments:

I prefer my disclaimer for September911Surprise.com and PirateNews.org, that under 17 US Code 107, it's Fair Use to make copies of videos for non-profit educational and personal use, and under Federal Rules of Evidence of a crime scene, it's everyone's responsiblity to copy and distribute this evidence. You never know if YOU will be subpoenaed to serve on the jury deciding the fate of the Bush Gang of domestic terrorists. Once these videos are entered into evidence in any trial, they become a public record that's immune to copyright protection.

posted by Anonymous : 6:41 PM