TOTAL INFORMATION ANALYSIS

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

This guy Olbermann was the world's biggest Clinton asslicker who quit his old MSNBC show b/c he didn't like reporting on the impeached one.

MS/NBC has been leading the Obama bandwagon / psy-ops and Olbermann was the last hold out.

GE want$ Brzezinski/Obama's new cold war vs Putin.

Is Olbermann psycho or a whore or what?

Labels: mockingbird, obama

Wednesday, December 05, 2007

Citizens for Legitimate Government has compiled the following information from mainstream media reports regarding the mass shooting today in Nebraska::

"Photo Shows Man In Handcuffs --Witness Reports 35-40 Shots 05 Dec 2007 A viewer photo shows a man in handcuffs after shots were fired inside the Von Maur store at Westroads Mall on Wednesday afternoon.

A description of the shooter, broadcast over scanners, was that he was in an Army-green vest and was holding a rifle. The viewer's photo showed a young man in [Army] fatigues surrounded by police and apparently in handcuffs. Police have not yet confirmed an arrest. It was reported by KETV crews that the man in fatigues was found under a bus bench. KETV NewsWatch 7's Carol Kloss said she could see a man in cuffs and a black, hooded sweatshirt surrounded by police.

'Witnesses described the suspect as a man wearing Army fatigues or camouflage.' [This reference has been purged from the New York Daily News article, but Google retained the Army fatigues reference. That reference has disappeared quicker than snow in July.] 9 dead, including suspect, in Omaha mall shooting 05 Dec 2007 A rifle-toting gunman went on a holiday murder spree in a crowded Nebraska mall Wednesday, killing eight shoppers. The killer, identified as Robert Hawkins, 19, left behind a note promising to "go out in style," Omaha television station KETV reported. His landlord told the station that Hawkins... was depressed because he had been fired from a local McDonald's. Hawkins, his hair in a military buzz cut, was reportedly wearing a camouflage vest and carrying a black backpack when he walked into the mall. It was the deadliest U.S. attack since a gunman left 32 people dead on the Virginia Tech campus in April, and the second mass shooting at a mall this year. Five people were killed and four wounded at a Salt Lake City mall in February, when police killed the gunman responsible.

Two men arrested in military fatigues in shopping mall shooting spree --'Guys dressed in camouflage, with guns, leaving a school bus, acting suspiciously before the shooting. Earlier in December, a live grenade was removed from this shopping mall... It was completely random -witness [the shooting]' (MSNBC live, 4:15PM EST 05 Dec 2007)


-----

Labels: false flag, mockingbird, rkba

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Total411.info has exposed the media fakery techniques used by NewsCorp to attack and defame Congressman Ron Paul, who is running against Sir Rudy for the GOP Presidential nomination. So this lawsuit comes as no surprise.



From Bloomberg News Nov. 14:

"Publisher Judith Regan, fired last year from News Corp.'s HarperCollins unit, claims her dismissal was part of a ``deliberate smear campaign'' aimed at protecting presidential candidate Rudolph Giuliani.

Regan, former president of HarperCollins' ReganBooks division, sued her former employer for defamation in state court in New York, seeking at least $100 million in damages. She claims in her complaint that News Corp. tried to destroy her reputation because she has information about former New York City Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik that would be harmful to ex-New York Mayor Giuliani and his presidential campaign.

``The smear campaign was necessary to advance News Corp.'s political agenda, which has long centered on protecting Rudy Giuliani's presidential ambitions,'' Regan said in the complaint filed yesterday.


[...]

Kerik, who was appointed to the post by then-New York City Mayor Giuliani, was indicted Nov. 9 by a federal grand jury on charges of tax evasion, conspiracy and lying to the White House. He pleaded guilty last year to state charges that he accepted thousands of dollars in gifts while in office.

Kerik turned down a 2004 offer by President George W. Bush to run the Homeland Security Department, a post Giuliani recommended him for, after it was disclosed that Kerik failed to pay taxes for a nanny that worked for him.


Federal prosecutors accuse Kerik of receiving cash and gifts for lobbying regulators on behalf of a New Jersey construction and waste-management firm and lying to investigators -- including those who were vetting him for the cabinet-level post on behalf of Bush -- and tried to conceal his crimes, prosecutors alleged.

Regan claims News Corp. executives attempted to ``preemptively discredit her'' to protect Giuliani and because of the ``damaging information'' they believed she possessed.

``It is now widely accepted that one of Giuliani's major political vulnerabilities is his association with Bernard Kerik,'' Regan said in her suit.

``A senior executive in the News Corp. organization told Regan that he believed she had information about Kerik that, if disclosed, would harm Giuliani's presidential campaign,'' according to the complaint. ``This executive advised Regan to lie to, and withhold information from, investigators concerning Kerik.''
-----

Labels: foxnews, mockingbird, sir rudy

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

MP3 DOWNLOAD HERE

Topics this week:


• Stephen Colbert enters Presidential race
  
  
• Portland survives TOPOFF4: False-flag averted
  
  
• Ron Paul tvfakery exposed: How Murdoch and Giuliani used trickery and deceit on live television in an anti-Ron Paul (& anti-American) psychological operation.

  Labels: colbert, military exercise, mockingbird, revere radio, Ron Paul, synthetic terror alert, terror drills

Sunday, October 21, 2007

These activists, affiliated with We Are Change L.A. were apparently responding to Commissar Maher's recent call for 9/11 dissenters to be forcibly drugged.

Labels: 9/11, mockingbird

Monday, September 17, 2007

Time-Warner television host Bill Maher, who has previously made a point of calling pharmaceutical drugs "poison," on Friday endorsed the drugging of Americans who don't endorse the treasonous 9/11 myth propagated by his corporate masters. Maher retreats to the "television is reality" meme, which is breaking apart under the relentless assault of independent 9/11 TVfakery researchers who must contend both with mainstream shills such as Maher as well as perps and dupes inside the "9/11 movement" itself.

Video:



Labels: 9/11, mind control, mockingbird, ssri, tvfakery

Monday, August 27, 2007

Labels: 9/11, mockingbird, pentagon, tvfakery, wtc

Friday, August 24, 2007

An abbreviated edition of Total Info Radio webcast August 20, with a focus on an instant analysis of the History Channel special "9/11 Conspiracies: Fact or Fiction?"

MP3 link

Notes:

• Offical History Channel webpage for the program
  
• Bohemian Club newsletter about Hearst newspapers
  
• Hon. Dr. Ron Paul on the current credit crisis
  
• Weekly World News: Coded messages for the elite?
  
• Bat Boy (2001 Original Off-Broadway Cast) [CAST RECORDING]

  Labels: 9/11, bohemian grove, mockingbird, revere radio, Ron Paul

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Author Webster Tarpley, who appeared in the "9/11 Conspiracies" special last night on the Hearst-Story Channel offers this reply:

"
9/11 Conspiracies: When a Knock is a Boost.

Webster G. Tarpley
21 August 2007

Tonight's History Channel program on 9/11 Conspiracies - Fact or Fiction shows how powerful our movement has become, and how contemptible our opposition is. The deck was stacked, the animations were distorted and fantastic, and the framework was rather nasty, but this was of course NBC News, read GE, which is now a hedge fund in drag. And even NBC News, often the slimiest of the networks, has been forced to pretend to refute numerous factual criticisms of the official story, one by one. I say pretend because most of the refutations were simply blanket denials, with no facts or reasoning beyond mere assertions that the 9/11 truth theses are not true, offend the families, are disgusting, or "corrosive," and other meaningless verbiage. Some of the attempts at substantive refutation involved dodges and subterfuges that seemed new, at least to me. It sounded like one of their pseudo-experts was arguing that the wings of the alleged airplane at the Pentagon had broken off through hitting objects on the Pentagon lawn. If that was so, where are the wings and the jet engines on that pristine Pentalawn? This pitiful construct is self-contradictory and destroys itself. We also heard that building 7 was hollow at the base, quite an achievement under the New York City building code. The bottom of building 7 was, we now discover, an amphitheater, with no support columns, but only trusses! I guess if your argument is ruptured, then you need a truss. Another pseudo-expert thought that a commercial aircraft could transform itself into an artillery shell or tank round and punch through the Pentagon rings that way, despite the obvious difficulty. CIA man Michael Scheuer says all the evidence points to al Qaeda, but where is all that evidence, Mike? There was none in this program, to be sure. Otherwise, Mike was reduced to some pitiful whining that there are too decent patriotic people in the CIA - a moot point.

Some of the little people had obviously been leaned on to get them to change their testimony. But that was done with a nominalist stupidity worthy of William of Okham, the dumbest philosopher of the late Middle Ages. The wretched New York TV reporter had to say that he had reported secondary explosions, but not bombs. What precisely is the difference, when heard from afar? The poor Shanksville coroner had said that after a few minutes at the crash site, he had stopped being a coroner because there were no bodies. Now he says that he meant that he became an undertaker. Again, what is the distinction he is driving at? Where there bodies yes or no?

Most of the refutations were weak, fishy, lame, and unconvincing. In particular, any time they have to bring on Chip Berlet, that well-known gutter-dwelling character assassin and mercenary of the foundations, you know they are in big trouble, and he was quite prominent. I believe strongly in the victory of reality over fabrication and lies, and I suspect that this was the response of many viewers tonight. If we had a focus group, we could be sure, but I think more 9/11 came into the world than there were doubters who fell back into the official version based on this program.

But look at all the important factual material they had to present. The viewers got to see the squibs coming out of the twin towers. They got to see building 7 coming down, with ample comparisons to controlled demolition cases. They got to hear and see the infamous Silverstein. They got to see the singed hole in the internal rings of the Pentagon. They got to see the Shanksville crater. They got to hear about false flag operations from a chorus of authoritative voices, and for that there was no refutation. They also got a good source list for further research: Loose Change was prominent, as were Alex Jones and 9/11 Mysteries. Thierry Meyssan, the founder of our worldwide movement, got more recognition tonight than he has ever received in this country, and it is about time - his book the Big Lie is and remains a classic. They go to know David Ray Griffin, Bob Bowman, Jim Fetzer and many more. There was even a plug for my own 9/11 Synthetic Terror. Any serious, intelligent person - and there still are some - knows exactly where to go to find out more, and that can only be a big plus.

[...]

Part of the genius of the 9/11 truth movement is our ability to make even the financier-controlled media spread our ideas and work for us. Despite the worst intentions of NBC News, I would say that this is what they have accomplished. They have kept 9/11 truth research in the public eye. There is an old Broadway saying - "A knock is a boost." In other words, if we are so obscure and so crazy, why do we merit any attention at all? Or, as the Roman put it - "Bona fama, mala fama, semper fama" - good fame, bad fame, it's all fame, and we'll take it - the wisdom of the ancients.

Two-hour documentaries are not cheap and need to get some ratings. Clearly we are not so obscure as NBC News would have us believe. In fact, if we can hold off the new 9/11 for a few more months, 2007 may turn out to be our finest hour.
-----

• Full text

  Labels: 9/11, mockingbird, tarpley

Monday, August 20, 2007

The History Channel is jointly owed by Hearst, General Electric, and Disney. Tonight, they'll attempt to prop up the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 by attacking skeptics. Listing from its History.com:

"9/11 Conspiracies: Fact or Fiction?

Monday, August 20 09:00 PM
Tuesday, August 21 01:00 AM
Saturday, August 25 08:00 PM
Sunday, August 26 12:00 AM

Examines the various conspiracy theories espoused on the Internet, in articles and in public forums that attempt to explain the 9/11 attacks. It includes theories that the World Trade Center was brought down by a controlled demolition; that a missile, not a commercial airliner, hit the Pentagon; and that members of the U.S. government orchestrated the attacks in hopes of creating a war in the Middle East. Each conspiracy argument is countered by a variety of experts in the fields of engineering, intelligence and the military. The program also delves into the anatomy of such conspiracies and how they grow on the Internet.

Rating: TVPG
Running Time: 120 minutes
-----

Labels: 9/11, mockingbird

Monday, August 13, 2007

From [Madison, Wisc.] Capitol Times, 8/11/2007:

"Dear Editor:

Your story on the recent Scholars for 9/11 Truth conference, "9/11 Doubters Doubt Each Other Too," was so distorted and pejorative that if I were a paranoid conspiracy theorist, I would suspect Popper of working for Project Mockingbird. (Google the term to see what I mean.)

Out of almost 20 hours of presentations, the reporter focused on the 10 seconds during which one presenter, Dave Von Kleist, expressed his fear of government infiltration of the 9/11 truth movement. And out of the many dozens of hours of informal conversation, Popper chose to highlight one in which similar fears were expressed.

I participated in many conversations throughout the weekend and can testify that all were convivial and concerned the science and politics of 9/11, not fears of government infiltration. For more on the conference, people can go to www.mujca.com/madisonconference.htm .

The reporter's aim in offering such a wildly distorted view of the conference can only have been to libel 9/11 truth seekers as paranoid -- a task that Isthmus already accomplished last summer, to its eternal shame and perhaps its eventual prosecution.

This libel, like the 9/11 blood libel against Muslims, dehumanizes its victims and makes its author, editor and publisher complicit in the holocaust of the 9/11 wars -- a holocaust that has already killed more than 650,000 people in Iraq alone and destroyed the lives of more than 6 million people in Iraq and Afghanistan by making them refugees.

As the example of Nuremberg suggests, journalists who act as propagandists for war crimes may one day find themselves on the scaffold. You would be well advised to strive for more balanced and accurate coverage in the future.

Kevin Barrett,
Lone Rock
-----

Labels: 9/11, mockingbird

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

CNN rigged the last Presidential primary debate in favor of John McCain (R-Manchuria), Mitt Romney (R-Mormon) and Rudy Giuliani (R-911). Those three topped the declared candidates in a CNN poll released Tuesday.

Top among the grassroots candidates disfavored and discriminated upon by the Communist News Network was Congressman Dr. Ron Paul of Texas. Paul received 3 percent in the biased poll.


• CNN report here

  Labels: mockingbird, Ron Paul

Friday, May 25, 2007

ABC and Rosie O'Donnell announced Friday that she would not be returning to The View. The announcement followed a coordinated attack on O'Donnell on the Wednesday edition of the program by MOCKINGBIRD producer Bill Geddie and co-host Elizabeth Hasselbeck.

Careful viewers Wednesday saw Hasselbeck, who recently attended an anti-American ceremony at the White House expressing fealty to the British Crown, rolling her eyes to concentrate on her earpiece and Geddie's voice rather than cohost Behar's. When Hasselbeck started goading and screaming at O'Donnell, Geddie did not cut to commercial and went to an unprecedented splitscreen shot to degrade the dialogue further. Behar objected to Geddie's maneuver live on air, but Geddie kept at it until there was enough footage for the shitty cable shows to dissect and slander.

Leading entertainment gossip web sites had previously reported that O'Donnell wanted Geddie out as a condition of any contract renewal.

The move certainly means that no guest will be scheduled to discuss he concept of "9/11 truth" in a positive light.

Labels: 9/11, mockingbird, rosie

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Black-helicopter nutjob Michelle Malkin had six questions about the official story of 9/11 back in 2002.

As published the following in Jewish World Review March 8, 2002:

"What really happened on United Airlines Flight 93? [...]
What really happened on American Airlines Flight 11? [...]
Who murdered Katherine Smith, and why? [...]
Why does Norm Mineta still have a job?
Who's responsible for the anthrax attacks? ...
So where the hell is Osama bin Laden, anyway?
-----

It is uncertain at press time whether Malkin has called for herself to be thrown into a concentration camp for articulating such dangerous thoughts.

Labels: 9/11, AA11, mockingbird, patsies, united 93

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Labels: 9/11 commission, foxnews, mockingbird, Ron Paul

Monday, April 16, 2007

Recent research reveals the WTC "controlled demolition" debate has been a constructed Hegelian dialectic since no later than 9/12 2001. For it was on that day that one Van Romero, of New Mexico Tech, announced in the local Albuquerque Journal that the Twin Towers were obviously taken out by a conventional controlled demolition. Romero quickly and quietly retracted his claim and disappeared from the scene. What was not revealed until now however, is that Romero is a major player in directed-energy weaponry, and a long time member of the Directed-Energy Professional Society (See 911researchers.com).

By planting the "controlled demolition" meme, Romero took eyes away from exotic and specifically directed-energy weapons' role in the destruction of the World Trade Center Complex.

How serendipitious, then, that Romero should also resurface this very weekend on the Discovery Channel of all places. Romero received special thanks for, and his Department presided over, something called "Conspiracy Test" -- an examination of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.

As OKBOMB is increasingly understood as 9/11 writ small, cursory reexamination yields the telltale signs of directed-energy weapons there too -- the powderized concrete, cylindrical cut-out patterned damage, and even scorch marks left on the roof by the earlier prototype of the weapon. Romero's constructed dialectic eschewed such anomalies however, restricting the acceptable frame of debate to truck-bomb vs column-bomb.

So it should be little surprise then that even as Romero's documentary premiered on Discovery, Discovery cameras were in Austin, Texas to tape a purportedly scientific presentation hewing to a similarly circumscribed 9/11 debate. For, as a result of an elaborate and targeted psychological operation aimed at leaders of the "patriot" community in the Austin area, the leading "scientific" figure speaking at the University of Texas conference came from the same 33^o exo-weaponry milieu as Romero.

Thus, any presentation by Discovery will be similarly restricted, between the ridiculous official theory(/ies) and the equally ludicrous "superthermate" theory. Such false opposition keeps activists' heads spinning on an untraceable thermite goose chase rather than agitating for grand-jury investigations of institutions such as Raytheon, Applied Research Associates, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and others whose weaponry can be tied to the utter devastation of World Trade Center.

A possible silver lining over Texas: secrecy-gagged panelist Col. Dr. Bob Bowman valiantly tried to warn on the Austin-based nationally-syndicated Deadline Live radio program Friday that "Star Wars" is offensive weaponry designed to take out targets such as buildings from space-based platforms, sewing confusion in doing so.

Labels: 9/11, directed-energy, disinformation, mockingbird, stj911

Sunday, March 04, 2007

When 9/11 researchers last week discovered and disseminated a clip of BBC news reporters announcing that WTC building 7 had "collapsed" more than 20 minutes before it was destroyed in a controlled demolition on September 11, 2001. Leading corporate-connected, CIA- and NWO-controlled websites such as Google Video attempted to purge the video from the web, but ultimately gave up in the face of thousands fo grassroots infowarriors continuously uploading the video.

The image brought to mind other incidents over the past year of corporate media using copyright as a pretext to censor reality on behalf of their New World Order masters

One day after the 2006 midterm election, Bill Maher appeared on CNN's Larry King Live and announced that everyone in Washington knew that RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman was gay. CNN edited the comment from the late-night replay of the program, but not before gay activist John Aravosis of AmericaBlog.com had posted the exchange to YouTube.

But the informational clip did not stay up on YouTube very long. CNN demanded that YouTube pull the video under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), and YouTube complied.

However, Arianna Huffington's Huffington Post also hosted a clip of Maher and King and persevered in hosting the clip despite the blizzard of legal claims which saw it purged from everywhere else on the net. Is the law different for YouTube than it is for HuffingtonPost? No. But they have different lawyers. HuffingtonPost, which stresses the importance of fearlessness, did not take the bogus legal arguments of YouTube and CNN at face value -- and they turned out just fine.

Last May, the producers of the 9/11 documentary "Loose Change" received a cease-and-desist letter from lawyers representing the Naudet Brothers, some of whose film taken on 9/11 was used in "Loose Change." "Loose Change" producers Louder Than Words, Inc. have kept the Naudet film in online versions of their film but reportedly will back off of using this footage in an upcoming theatrical release.

Since that incident, the Naudet brothers have proved their motivation behind the legal threats to be little more than the suppression of information regarding 9/11. For after all, the most important Naudet footage used in "Loose Change", of New York firemen describing the explosions that went off in the twin towers, was in fact purged from the fifth anniversary edition of the film which aired on CBS September 11, 2006.

As "Loose Change" moves toward a theatrical edition and the BBC incident portends greater video battle ahead, the 9/11 truth movement should become increasingly fearless in asserting First Amendment free speech and fair use rights in intellectual property issues. At primary issue is evidence of a crime of mass murder -- evidence which should not be suppressed by those seeking to abuse copyright law. If an IP attorney with a history of siding with copyright totalists advises cowering before the likes of the Naudet brothers, he perhaps should be shunted aside for one more fearless -- one who would relish the opportunity to call the Naudets on their bluff and put them under oath about their possible foreknowledge of 9/11.

Labels: intellectual property, mockingbird

Sunday, February 04, 2007

John Conner of the Resistance reports that talk show host Alan Colmes will no longer discuss the 9/11 inside job on his radio program. Alex Jones and others have discussed the matter in the past on the show. From Loose Change Forum Feb 3 2007:

"This shill.

He said the other day, on air, that I lie to get on the show, and when I am honest he'll let me on. So I told the screener who I was tonight. First and last name.

Alan got on the phone during the break and we had a little chat. He said he's done with me and Alex Jones and said what I say is "irrelevant."

"IRRELEVANT," HE SAYS! What a shill. He said he'd never have me as a guest, and I asked him, if I would call his show and make comments on relevant topics, if he would at least let me get on air as a caller. And he said that would be nice, and hung up on me instead of putting me back on hold.

So we have no agreement. There is no truce between us. He is a coward and a corporate whore. He won't cover the issues because he'll lose his job. The first half hour of his show he takes calls on any topic with no call screener, but when I call as "John from San Diego" he NEVER takes my call, and leaves me on hold for the ENTIRE show, takes DOZENS of calls and leaving me on the board instead of hanging up -- because he knows I'll just call back from a different city.

Stream his show live at this link. Save it in your favorites. Show is live from 7 to 10pm pacific. 9 to midnight central. 10 to 1pm eastern. phone number is 1 877- 367-2526 call it every day.

http://www.talkers.am/beta/Hosts/Alan-colmes.htm

-----

Labels: 9/11, mockingbird

Thursday, February 01, 2007

Press release from Scholars for 9/11 Truth February 1, 2007:

"Members of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, a non-partisan organization of students, experts and scholars dedicated to exposing falsehoods and revealing truths about 9/11, have some bones to pick with CBS NEWS for an article entitled, "Dangerous World Fuels Conspiracy Theorists" (30 January 2007). According to James H. Fetzer, the society's founder, "It is chock full of false assertions, even including misidentification of Steven Jones, my former co-chair, as the society 's founder."

"That is rather rich," Fetzer said. "Steve and I have had a parting of the ways over differences in our attitude and approach toward the science and the politics of 9/11 research. But if he had been 'the founder', he should have been conducting a 'house cleaning', not abandoning ship." The split between them, Fetzer added, has had a beneficial effect. "A cult-like atmosphere had developed around him, which I considered to be bad for scientific research on 9/11."

The CBS report focuses on Gary Welz, an adjunct lecturer at John Jay Criminal College and Lafayette University, who told a CBS reporter, Alfonso Serrano, that he had left Scholars in December following Jones "after other prominent members of Scholars began promoting wacky explanations for the fall of the twin towers." Fetzer replied, "That's wrong on several accounts, including that the Twin Towers did not 'fall' but disintegrated from massive sources of energy."

"Which theories are 'wacky' appears to depend upon how much you know about a subject," observed Judy Wood, a prominent member of Scholars. "When you consider the extent of the devastation of the World Trade Center, the very modest damage to its foundation, and as many as 1,400 'toasted' cars as much as a mile from ground zero, for example, any explanation that is based upon conventional explosives, including Steve Jones' own hypothesis, is going to look 'wacky' to those who know enough about the evidence in this case."

Although Jones has suggested that thermite and thermate could have brought down the Twin Towers, in a recent chapter in a new book edited by David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott, 9/11 and American Empire (2007), Jones expresses astonishment that the top thirty floors of the South Tower started to fall but "turned mostly to powder in mid-air," an effect that his hypothesis cannot explain. "Indeed," Fetzer said, "other recognized scholars, such as Webster Griffin Tarpley, 9/11: Synthetic Terror (2005), have observed that an adequate explanation of the devastation to the WTC will almost certainly require the use of high-tech, directed energy weapons."

Among the claims CBS reported that are inaccurate or outdated, the statistics for skepticism from a Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll have been superseded by a New York Times/CBS poll conducted last October, which showed that 53% of Americans doubt The 9/11 Report and 28% reject it completely, which means that 81% of the American people don't believe what the government has told them. "I don't quite understand how a CBN NEWS report could overlook the results of a poll in which CBS participated," Fetzer observed.

Wood pointed out that Jones' hypothesis is based on three primary sources of evidence: studies of dust samples, a waterfall-like flow of molten metal from the South Tower, and photographs that show workmen peering into a cavern glowing with molten metal. "I think Steve needs to think more about his own evidence," she said. "The dust samples were non-random and, if these photographs were authentic, the heat should have melted the skin from their faces." ...

Fetzer said, "another student of the case, Frank Greening, discovered a possible alternative explanation for the waterfall-like flow of molten metal, which Jones had insisted had to be molten iron caused by thermite or thermate. "Apparently, Fuji Bank had installed a massive assemblage of server-sized lead batteries around the 80th floor. Since lead melts at a much lower temperature than steel," Fetzer added, "that might explain this peculiar phenomenon, which was distinctive to this location."

[...]"The situation is even more awkward for the government than that," said Wood. "The buildings are actually turning to dust from the top down. It is as though two enormous trees were turning to sawdust before our eyes. The concrete floors, the desks, chairs, computers, even human beings and other living things, are being pulverized by some massive source of energy, which neither Jones' hypothesis nor the official account can explain. We are attempting to determine how this was done, but it probably involved the use of weapons that are classified. There's nothing 'wacky' about trying to figure it out."[...]

The adjunct math lecturer it cites, Gary Welz, told CBS NEWS that he is not a "conspiracy theorist" because he is not convinced there was a government conspiracy. "If that's his position," Fetzer replied, "that's very peculiar. I can't imagine a serious member of Scholars who wouldn't be able to demonstrate that the government has been lying to the American people based upon studies at our web site, 911scholars.org. For CBS NEWS to put out a misleading and false report without consulting relevant experts," he observed, "makes this a stellar example of irresponsible reporting. It's a hatchet job!"

"A phone call could have cleared up these misconceptions," Fetzer said, "but Alfonso probably knew how he wanted to spin this. We have proven that the official account cannot possibly be true and are trying to figure out how it was done." He smiled and said, "It is ironic that more accurate information about Scholars for 9/11 Truth can be found in HUSTLER than on CBS NEWS."...

-----

Labels: 9/11, mockingbird, tarpley

Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Shrill shills shake Semite shibboleth:



• Unedited audio of complete CNN interview of Christopher Bollyn

  Labels: 9/11, mockingbird

Sunday, January 28, 2007

One of several letters published in the Feb. 5, 2007 edition of The Nation in response to the Marxist rag's hit-piece on 9/11 truth (introduction included):

"9/11: THE JURY'S STILL OUT

"9/11: The Roots of Paranoia" by Christopher Hayes (Dec. 25) drew more mail than almost any Nation article in memory, except perhaps on the JFK assassination. Letters ran the gamut from the enraged (canceled subscriptions, charges of Nation stonewalling, anger at the use of the term "paranoia") to the complimentary ("My thanks to Mr. Hayes for trying to chart a middle road between credulity and paranoia"). But almost all agree that we don't know the whole story of what happened on September 11, 2001.
--------------------------------------

Oregon, Wisc.

As the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, I read "9/11: The Roots of Paranoia" with great interest. Its author cites a few of the questions that have troubled students of 9/11, but neglects most of the answers that we have established based upon objective, scientific investigation. In the name of fair play, here is a summary of our findings, substantiation for which may be found at our website, www.st911.org.

One preliminary point. If belief in conspiracies is enough to qualify one as "paranoid," then our highest government officials should be escorted to homes for the mentally bewildered, since they had been propounding a conspiracy theory even prior to investigation. Consider:

The impact of the planes cannot have caused enough damage to bring the buildings down, since the buildings were designed to withstand them (as Frank DeMartini, the project manager, observed), the planes that hit were similar to those they were designed to withstand, and the buildings continued to stand after those impacts with negligible effects.

The melting point of steel at 2,800 degrees F is about 1,000 degrees higher than the maximum burning temperature of jet-fuel-based fires, which do not exceed 1,800 degrees under optimal conditions, so the fires cannot have caused the steel to melt, which means that melting steel did not bring the buildings down.

UL certified the steel in the buildings up to 2,000 degrees F for three or four hours before it would significantly weaken, whereas these fires burned too low and too briefly at an average temperature of around 500 degrees--about one hour in the South Tower and one and a half in the North--to have even caused the steel to weaken, much less melt.

If the steel had melted or weakened, the affected floors would have displayed completely different behavior, with some asymmetrical sagging and tilting, which would have been gradual and slow, not the complete, abrupt and total demolition that was observed.

William Rodriguez, the senior custodian in the North Tower and the last man to leave the building, has reported massive explosions in the sub-basements that effected extensive destruction, including the demolition of a fifty-ton hydraulic press and the ripping of the skin off a fellow worker, a report corroborated by the testimony of many other custodians.

Rodriguez has reported that the explosion occurred prior to the airplane's impact, a claim that has now been substantiated in a new study by Craig Furlong and Gordon Ross, "Seismic Proof: 9/11 Was an Inside Job," which demonstrates that these explosions actually took place as much as fourteen and seventeen seconds prior to the airplanes' impacts.

Heavy-steel-construction buildings like the Twin Towers are not generally capable of "pancake collapse," which normally occurs only with concrete structures of "lift slab" construction and could not occur in redundant welded-steel buildings, such as the towers, unless every supporting column were removed at the same time, as Charles Pegelow has pointed out to me.

The destruction of the South Tower in about ten seconds and of the North Tower in nine is even faster than free fall with only air resistance, which would have taken at least twelve seconds, which, as Judy Wood has emphasized, is an astounding result that would have been impossible without extremely powerful explosives.

The towers are exploding from the top, not collapsing to the ground, where their floors do not move, a phenomenon that Wood has likened to two gigantic trees turning to sawdust from the top down, which, like the pulverization of the concrete, the official account cannot possibly explain.

Pools of molten metal were found at the subbasement levels three, four and five weeks later, an effect that could not have been produced by the plane-impact/jet-fuel-fire/pancake collapse scenario, which, of course, implies that it was not produced by such a cause.

WTC-7 came down in a classic controlled demolition at 5:20 pm after Larry Silverstein suggested the best thing to do might be to "pull it," displaying all the characteristics of classic controlled demolitions: a complete, abrupt and total collapse into its own footprint, where the floors are all falling at the same time, and so forth, an event so embarrassing to the official account that it is not even mentioned in the 9/11 Commission report.

The hit point at the Pentagon was too small to accommodate a 100-ton airliner with a 125-foot wingspan and a tail that stands forty-four feet above the ground; the debris was wrong for a Boeing 757: no wings, no fuselage, no seats, no bodies, no luggage, no tail! Which means the building was not hit by a Boeing 757.

The Pentagon's own videotape does not show a Boeing 757 hitting the building, as even Bill O'Reilly admitted when it was shown on The O'Reilly Factor; at 155 feet, the plane was more than twice as long as the seventy-one-foot Pentagon is high and should have been present and visible; it was not, which means that the building was not hit by a Boeing 757.

The aerodynamics of flight would have made the official trajectory--flying at high speed barely above ground level--physically impossible; and if it had come in at an angle instead, it would have created a massive crater; but there is no crater and the government has no way out, which means that the building was not hit by a Boeing 757.

If Flight 93 had come down as advertised, there should have been a debris field about the size of a city block, but the debris is distributed over an area of about eight square miles, which would be explainable if the plane had been shot down in the air but not if it had crashed, as required by the government's official scenario.

There is more, especially about the alleged hijackers, including that they were not competent to fly the planes and their names were not on any passenger manifest. Several have turned up alive and well and living in the Middle East. The government has not even produced their tickets as evidence that they actually could have boarded the aircraft they are alleged to have hijacked. Did Osama call from a cave in Afghanistan and charge them to his MasterCard?

President Bush recently acknowledged that Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11. The Senate Intelligence Committee has reported that Saddam was not in cahoots with Al Qaeda. And the FBI has acknowledged that it has "no hard evidence" to tie Osama to 9/11. If Saddam did not do it and Osama did not do it, then who is responsible for the deaths of 3,000 Americans that day? We believe the nation is entitled to the truth.

JAMES H. FETZER
-----

Labels: 9/11, fetzer, left gatekeepers, mockingbird

From Wayne Madsen Report Jan. 26:

"Cheney's media adviser Cathie Martin wrote down Cheney's options for attacking the Wilsons in the media. First was to go to White House lickspittle and General Electric (major defense contractor)/NBC employee Tim Russert. The memo also mentions "leak" to Sanger (David Sanger NYT), Pincus (Walter Pincus, Washington Post), and "newsmag." In February 2004, Bush said, "If there's a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is . . . If the person has violated law, that person will be taken care of . . . Leaks of classified information are bad things." There is also a reference to Bob Woodward and calling intelligence and sitting in a room and debate. Martin crossed out the names of National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley and Scooter Libby (Scooter) as action managers for the leak. However, Cheney's (VP), Donald Rumsfeld's, and Condoleeza Rice's (Condi) names are left intact. This memo is the smoking gun for the criminal conspiracy against the Wilsons, one that also compromised Brewster Jennings & Associates and their work to stem the flow of weapons of mass destruction. The memo is actionable evidence against Cheney, Libby, Rice, and Hadley. Libby's defense team has already implicated Karl Rove. The written memos being produced by both sides in the Libby trial are the "Watergate tapes," the smoking guns to justify immediate articles of impeachment against Bush and Cheney.
-----

Labels: cheney, libby, mockingbird