TOTAL INFORMATION ANALYSIS

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Some decent research found on Loose Change Forums May 11 2007 raises questions about the supposed piece of airliner fuselage that was found atop WTC%, the DeutscheBank building.:

"Always wondered about this alleged UA 175 fragment photographed atop WTC 5.

The top image is by Massachusetts Urban Search And Rescue.

The bottom image is FEMA's of the same fragment.

Did FEMA alter the color of a seemingly beige fragment to better resemble the dark grey of a UA aircraft?

The government has no excuse now, not to release any aircraft evidence in it's possession to the NTSB for final identification.

No ID'd parts. No black boxes (supposedly). But plenty of Iraqi WMD's!


-----

The color-shift photo-fakery trick is one often used by supporters of the official story of 9/11. CLICK HERE for an analysis of similar trickery by Los Alamos weapons scientist Steve Jones. Note Jones has also heavily relied on the photo above as "proof" for the offical government conspiracy "plane theory."


Labels: 9/11, fema, photo fakery, stj911

Sunday, February 11, 2007

The latest on alleged 9/11 photographer Val McClatchy from Flight 93 Photo Fraud blog February 11, 2007:

"There has been an ongoing debate as to whether Val is able to profit from the sales of her photo. Some say that Val is unable to profit from any of the prints she sells because, as the website that advertises Val’s photo states, checks are to be made out to the Todd Beamer Foundation.

[...] However, if all the checks are made out to the charity, how does Val get reimbursed $2 per print she keeps to cover for supplies and shipping and how is she able to keep some of the proceeds she admits keeping in order to help fight her lawsuit against the AP?

I’ve pointed out before that in at least one occasion, a magazine that had advertised Val’s photo for sale did not say to write checks out to the Beamer Foundation, but told people to make it out in Val’s name. I’ve also argued that it’s possible that people going to her work to buy a print might be able to pay cash for it.

I have also wondered how many people who went to the website that advertises Val’s photo where it says to write checks out to the Beamer Foundation accidentally goofed and wrote their check out in Val’s name and still got a print, so to test out this theory, I had someone “accidentally” write out a check in Val's name:

...to and he got one of these.

Remember, it’s by the honor system that Val forwards her proceeds. Let’s just hope Val is true to her word and forwards $18 from this check to the Beamer Foundation.
-----

Labels: 9/11, photo fakery

Thursday, November 02, 2006

As posted by the Forum Adminstrator of Nothing Is Real Dec. 13, 2004:

"[Re: PAUL MCCARTNEY'S ears-es]

The lobes aren't always covered, and think about this, they shouldn't change. Post 66 Paul should always have an attached earlobe, catch him just once (and it's been more than once) without this feature, and there's some explaining to do..

Photo fakery is a problem...it happens, believe it.

I bought the book "The Beatles Story" written by Billy Shepherd, (couldn't resist with a name like that) from the UK version of Amazon, and posted this pic on the other forum. Mine said inside "first published in 1964", which leaves out when it was actually published.



TotalInformation posted the same pic from a 1964 version:



Does this tell you something? It should say: deliberate planning.

If it's here, then it's elsewhere.. That's why you need vintage photos..(mine on the left, TI's on the right)




Note that in the original photo on the right, Paul has an attached earlobe; but the airbrushed version shades the ear so as to create the impression of a detached earlobe.

Labels: beatles, photo fakery

Sunday, January 18, 2004

Labels: JPL, NASA, photo fakery