TOTAL INFORMATION ANALYSIS

Tuesday, June 03, 2008

Libertarian Presidential nominee Bob Barr keeps his distance but doesn't close the door, telling Reason.com May 24:

"Certainly, as a former prosecutor, if anybody brings me legitimate evidence that a crime has been committed, certainly that would be duly investigated by the DOJ. But I'm not interested in conspiracy theories. I'm interested in moving the country forward.
-----


Green nominee Cynthia McKinney cites her record in the U.S. Congress on her official Facebook page:

"[Cynthia] challenged Pentagon Secretary Rumsfeld and Chairman Myers of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on the $2.3 trillion missing Pentagon money and on U.S.-sponsored war games taking place on September 11, 2001...

After the tragedy of September 11th, 2001, Cynthia introduced legislation that would allow the survivors of the tragedy's victims to sue those responsible for the attacks as well as participate in the Victims Compensation Fund.
-----


Constitution Party nominee Chuck Baldwin talked about unanswered questions (and cited lead 9/11 COINTELPRO agent Steven Jones) during a recent campaign appearance [YouTube]:

"As to 9/11, I don't know the answer to that. I don't know whether there was any kind of an inside apparatus involved in this or not.

[...]

If I was President of the United States, I would have no reservation whatsoever to appoint or convene an independent investigative committee to analyze the evidence and to find out the truth about 9/11. . .

If there's nothing to hide, there's nothing to fear. . . If there's duplicity involved, and some kind of a conspiracy, then let's find out what it is and let's deal with the people who were involved . And if not, let's put the evidence on the table and satisfy the questions the American people have.

-----

Labels: 9/11, bob barr, cynthia mckinney, stj911

Friday, July 06, 2007

On this week's program:


• Ron Paul on Independence Day, Austrian economics, and commodity money
  
  
• Discourse on the World Trade Center's secret concrete core and what that means for directed-energy weapons research.
  
  
• Discussion with callers about the cult of BOB DYLAN -- has an FBI-backed doppelganger been playing the role of DYLAN since late 1966?
  
  SHOW NOTES:
  
  
• BreakForNews.com mp3 & forum discussion on concrete core theory
  
  
• January 8 Totall Info Radio: Revelation of the WTC method: Explosive concrete, microwaves, and the smoking antenna
  
  
• NASA develops silicon carbide HDTV transmitter antennas
  
  
• Silicon carbide is a microwave susceptor
  
  
• "OF BOB DYLAN" by Johnny Cash. (Liner notes from "Nashville Skyline")

  Labels: directed-energy, doppelgangers, revere radio, stj911, wtc

Monday, July 02, 2007

Construction expert Christopher A. Brown has evaluated the World Trade Center "blueprints" leaked by the founder of STJ911 disinformation cell, Steven E. Jones.

Brown's analysis follows:

"Unfortunately the WTC plans released appear to be fraudulently presented as "Construction Drawings" or "Architectural plans" actually used for construction of WTC 1.

[...]

The following is an analyses of random samples of the revisions table from the graphics files of the above [Jones-leaked] WTC 1 plans "4.)PAC1 TOWER A". The analysis of graphic appearances and text from the "4.)PAC1 TOWER A" subdirectory above.

Most of the dimensions are not legible at any zoom level on any of the scans. The title block shows 1967 on most sets, some are not legible.

Below is a portion of the title block of A-A-13.TIFF



PROBLEMS WITH AUTHENTICITY OF THE ABOVE.

Note the lack of clouding (dots and trash) in the background of the actual dated "REVISIONS" table. An area usually really smudged creating major clouding in a scanned plan. NOTE the clean, sharp edged cutoff of the dot cloud to the right of the word "REVISIONS". Something VERY typical of photoshopping documents.

NONE OF THE SHEETS ARE ACCEPTED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OF THE PLANNING DIVISION. You can count on every sheet being signed with approval on a job for a building with this prominence.

These are not construction drawings. If they were from LERA they would be from scanned from vellums and these are from beat up blue lines judging by the clouding trash on them. Some of the digital files were created on 10/15/02 at 4:44 AM

Below is a portion of the title block revisions table of A-A-99.TIFF Notice the anomaly in the initial columns of the left side table, 3rd cell from the bottom.



[At right] is a zoom of that cell. Not much to be said about it except it definitely does not belong there and it is some sort of digital, graphic artifact. Not a hand lettered initial. far too straight for too many pixels

A portion of the title block revisions table of A-A-139.TIFF [and] title block revisions of the table on A-A-140.TIFF also has the same anomaly with its characteristics.

Sheet A-A-141.TIFF has the same anomaly but twice. ..

Comparison of the initials of the revisions tables of 99 and 139 show the same initials circled in blue are suspicious and could be the same numbers copied and pasted perhaps after being separated from their accompanying triangular detail numbers and being altered by scaling. blurring or distorting. The date appears as the same quite often in the "REVISIONS" tables.

CONCLUSION

The plans are actually 1964 plans that have had their date altered to appear as 1967 or during construction. Since there is no approval by the chief of the planning division it is certain the plans are not actual construction drawings.

Clearly the anomaly in the revisions table should not be there and the table is free of most clouding where there should be more than usual. Slice lines of graphic manipulations appear in A-A-13.TIFF.

It seem very likely that a revisions table was scanned and dissected then reassembled into a graphic which matched the title block of the WTC 1 preliminary set then pasted in. The entire file could then had been rescaled or saved at another resolution to hide the splices.

The .dxf files are useless and mostly nonsense. One file "wtc1_2000.dxf" is a product of the "LZA Technology A Division of The Thornton Tomasetti Group" and appears to be the beginning of an effort to analyze the plane impacts as the impact area of flight 11 is shown.

Since the WTC2 plans are missing it is clear that is because the WTC2 plans only show the concrete core and cannot be used to deceive the public as to the actual construction of the towers by representing them as having 47 steel core columns. The concrete core of the towers is documented with images from 9-11 here.

-----

• Go to source link for images from tiff files 139, 140 and 141

  Labels: 9/11, cointelpro, stj911, wtc

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

MP3 DOWNLOAD

This 100-minute edition of Total Information Radio aired on Revere Radio Network Monday night. Highlights:


• Hear actor/lecturer tell Gary Welz WPIX he saw an airplane hit the World Trade Center, a story he has since retracted. Hear another "9/11 eyewitness" who appears to be Welz in disguise.
  
  
• Callers!
  
  
• The last lost BEATLES track? Samarkhand Mystery Tour
  
  
• Peggy Carter of NYC911truth with an update ongoing 9/11 litigation, and announcing an upcoming 9/11 truth video installation by avant-garde artist Nico Haupt.
  
  
• Excerpts of and commentary on the Congressional hearing examining the Environmental Protection Agency's pronouncements on 9/11 air quality.
  
  
• Killtown offers thoughts on Gary Welz and 9/11 censorship.

  Labels: 9/11, beatles, dust, revere radio, stj911, tvfakery

Sunday, June 24, 2007

The following presentation examines Gary Welz, an actor/lecturer, who apparently donned a disguise to play the part of an "air crash witness" in footage aired on MSNBC on 9/11/2001. Welz is a founding member of the disinformation cell STJ911, who in an interview with CBS News, denounced Scholars for 9/11 Truth for examining classified, exotic weaponry in relation to the destruction of the World Trade Center.


Someone claiming to be Welz, in a comment on 911researchers.com, has now denied that it was him in the MSNBC interview:

Yes, I am an actor and an adjunct lecturer at John Jay College and I was an eyewitness on 9/11 but I did not participate in fake news interviews or say anything about 9/11 except what I believe to be true. The person interviewed on Fox [sic.; i.e.: MSNBC] who looks a bit like me is definitely not me. I support the 9/11 truth movement and I'm very surprised to find myself attacked in this way...

Labels: 9/11, stj911, tvfakery

Monday, June 11, 2007

After independent researchers filed Requests for Correction earlier this year with federal agency NIST regarding the WTC, disinformation cell STJ911 followed quickly, claiming to have filed a copycat RFC which unfortunately suckered in naive co-complainants, including victims' family members.

However, several months after claiming to have filed the RFC, the Department of Commerce, which oversees NIST (National Institute for Standards and Technology), has not posted the RFC has received to its online archive of received RFCs as maintained by its Chief Information Officer. This, despite the fact that the STJ911 RFC was purportedly filed April 12, and a supplement, dated April 20, to independent researcher Dr. Judy Wood's RFC, has been posted to the CIO's website for some weeks now.

One possible explanation is that the RFC filed by STJ911 did not in fact challenge the quality of NIST's data so much as praise it. The RFC process is a result of the Data Quality Act, which provides a form of redress for citizens who find data ginned up by federal bureaucracy to fraudulent.

Yet the RFC filed by STJ911 in fact praises the quality of NIST's fraudulent aircraft collision data and only demands that NIST share more of their purportedly fabulous (yet factually fraudulent) data with the public. This is a classic false-opposition tactic, pretending to argue with the powers-that-be when in fact buttressing their central premises. Indeed, the purported RFC filed by STJ911 asserts that "in real life" Boeing airliners crashed into the World Trade Center towers.

This appears to be an attempt to bait NIST into explicitly endorsing claims made by the criminal federal agency FEMA regarding Boeing airliner crashes. One of the co-authors of the purported STJ911 RFC, Los Alamos' Mormon WMD developer Dr. Steven Jones, has cited obviously planted aircraft debris pimped by FEMA in its reports regarding 9/11.

Dr. Jones has claimed on 911blogger.com to expect a response from NIST on June 11th to his fraudulent complaint. Given the efforts by Dr. Jones' false-opposition cell to prop up NIST's fraudulent claims, Dr. Jones may indeed have the inside track on what NIST is to do next.

Labels: 9/11, cointelpro, los alamos, stj911

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

The thermate theory of so-called "controlled demolition" of the World Trade Center towers has apparently been debunked by its own leading proponent, Los Alamos weapons developer Steven E. Jones.

Dr. James Fetzer, founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, highlighted this in a recent exchange with Jones:

"You do not seem to have found BARIUM NITRATE, Ba(NO3)2, an ingredient in military versions of thermite, yet you have used videos of the use of military versions of thermite to illustrate its cutting power relative to engine blocks. I presume those exercises included Barium Nitrate among the ingredients. Don't these videos have to be redone relative to these analogs? How do experiments with thermite relate to work on thermite analogs? How do these "analogs" work?
-----

Fetzer likely meant to ask about barium oxide, which would be left after the incendiary reaction. And indeed, wikipedia's definition of thermate confirms that military-grade thermate contains 29 percent barium nitrate:

"Thermate is an incendiary compound used for military applications. Thermate, whose primary component is thermite, also contains sulfur and possibly barium nitrate, both of which increase its thermal effect, create flame in burning, and significantly reduce the ignition temperature. Various mixtures of these compounds can be called thermate, but, to avoid confusion with Thermate-TH3, one can refer to them as thermite variants or analogs. The composition by weight of Thermate-TH3 (in military use) is 68.7% thermite, 29.0% barium nitrate, 2.0% sulphur and 0.3% binder.
-----

Jones has acknowledged as much in an article posted on his website, in which he announces he is now on the hunt for 10 tons worth of other, ill-defined "thermite analogs" -- any of which would still be woefully inadequate to explain the scale of the damage at the World Trade Center.

Labels: 9/11, stj911, thermate

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Some decent research found on Loose Change Forums May 11 2007 raises questions about the supposed piece of airliner fuselage that was found atop WTC%, the DeutscheBank building.:

"Always wondered about this alleged UA 175 fragment photographed atop WTC 5.

The top image is by Massachusetts Urban Search And Rescue.

The bottom image is FEMA's of the same fragment.

Did FEMA alter the color of a seemingly beige fragment to better resemble the dark grey of a UA aircraft?

The government has no excuse now, not to release any aircraft evidence in it's possession to the NTSB for final identification.

No ID'd parts. No black boxes (supposedly). But plenty of Iraqi WMD's!


-----

The color-shift photo-fakery trick is one often used by supporters of the official story of 9/11. CLICK HERE for an analysis of similar trickery by Los Alamos weapons scientist Steve Jones. Note Jones has also heavily relied on the photo above as "proof" for the offical government conspiracy "plane theory."


Labels: 9/11, fema, photo fakery, stj911

Monday, April 16, 2007

Recent research reveals the WTC "controlled demolition" debate has been a constructed Hegelian dialectic since no later than 9/12 2001. For it was on that day that one Van Romero, of New Mexico Tech, announced in the local Albuquerque Journal that the Twin Towers were obviously taken out by a conventional controlled demolition. Romero quickly and quietly retracted his claim and disappeared from the scene. What was not revealed until now however, is that Romero is a major player in directed-energy weaponry, and a long time member of the Directed-Energy Professional Society (See 911researchers.com).

By planting the "controlled demolition" meme, Romero took eyes away from exotic and specifically directed-energy weapons' role in the destruction of the World Trade Center Complex.

How serendipitious, then, that Romero should also resurface this very weekend on the Discovery Channel of all places. Romero received special thanks for, and his Department presided over, something called "Conspiracy Test" -- an examination of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.

As OKBOMB is increasingly understood as 9/11 writ small, cursory reexamination yields the telltale signs of directed-energy weapons there too -- the powderized concrete, cylindrical cut-out patterned damage, and even scorch marks left on the roof by the earlier prototype of the weapon. Romero's constructed dialectic eschewed such anomalies however, restricting the acceptable frame of debate to truck-bomb vs column-bomb.

So it should be little surprise then that even as Romero's documentary premiered on Discovery, Discovery cameras were in Austin, Texas to tape a purportedly scientific presentation hewing to a similarly circumscribed 9/11 debate. For, as a result of an elaborate and targeted psychological operation aimed at leaders of the "patriot" community in the Austin area, the leading "scientific" figure speaking at the University of Texas conference came from the same 33^o exo-weaponry milieu as Romero.

Thus, any presentation by Discovery will be similarly restricted, between the ridiculous official theory(/ies) and the equally ludicrous "superthermate" theory. Such false opposition keeps activists' heads spinning on an untraceable thermite goose chase rather than agitating for grand-jury investigations of institutions such as Raytheon, Applied Research Associates, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and others whose weaponry can be tied to the utter devastation of World Trade Center.

A possible silver lining over Texas: secrecy-gagged panelist Col. Dr. Bob Bowman valiantly tried to warn on the Austin-based nationally-syndicated Deadline Live radio program Friday that "Star Wars" is offensive weaponry designed to take out targets such as buildings from space-based platforms, sewing confusion in doing so.

Labels: 9/11, directed-energy, disinformation, mockingbird, stj911