TOTAL INFORMATION ANALYSIS

Saturday, September 27, 2008

Total Information Radio v3.36:


• MP3 DOWNLOAD
  
  
• Obama updates
  
  
• pumpitout.com 911 interviews alleged 9/11 cameramen, videographers
  
  
• MORE

  Labels: 9/11, obama, revere radio, tvfakery

Tuesday, August 19, 2008

Late reporting, but still... From MSNBC:

"Part of the elaborate Olympics fireworks show broadcast to the world in the opening ceremony was altered, done digitally in 3-D computer graphics, according to several news reports.

While the dramatic display actually happened as portrayed on television, members of the Beijing Olympic Committee said it was necessary to replace live video with computer-generated imagery because the city’s hazy, smoggy skies made it too difficult to see, according to The Beijing Times, which first reported the story.

Committee members also said they were concerned that the helicopter pilot who would have flown overhead to film the fireworks would have been “at risk by making him try to follow the firework route,” according to a quote from a committee member reported in a Daily Telegraph story.

[...]

Even those at the city’s new Bird’s Nest National Stadium, where the Olympics are being held, viewed the computer-generated footage from their seats as they watched on the stadium’s giant television screens, said Britain’s Sky News in a story.

“Stunned viewers thought they were watching the string of fireworks filmed from above by a helicopter,” said SkyNews.com. “But in reality they were watching a 3-D graphics sequence that took almost a year to produce.”

There were some real fireworks going on outside the stadium. But the footprint display was “inserted into the coverage electronically at exactly the right moment,” the Daily Telegraph said.

“Meticulous efforts were made to ensure the sequence was as unnoticeable as possible,” the newspaper reported Xiaolong as saying. “They sought advice from the Beijing meteorological office as to how to recreate the hazy effects of Beijing’s smog at night, and inserted a slight camera shake effect to simulate the idea that it was filmed from a helicopter.”
-----






And of course, the singing was lip-synched.

Labels: ChiComs, tvfakery

Monday, June 16, 2008

Labels: 9/11, tvfakery

Monday, April 21, 2008

• MP3 DOWNLOAD of the latest Total Information Radio
  
  
• IVAW seizes National Archives
  
  
• Bob Barr on terrorist bogeymen
  
  
• Onion News: Suspicious package industry takes major hit
  
  
• Woman arrested at Jefferson Memorial for questioning fed
  
  
• Ron Paul on the Bank bailouts $ the Federal Reserve
  
  
• Zappa/Duran guitarist Warren Cuccorullo talks 9/11 TV fakery with Deadline Live
  
  
• Music: Cuccorullo debuts "We're All Targets"
  
  
• Ron Paul speaks to the Freedom Rally @ US Capitol
  
  
• Dr. James Fetzer (Scholars for 9/11 Truth) speaks to the Freedom Rally
  
  
• Libertarians for Justice debuts - new 9/11 caucus in the LP
  
  
• FLASHBACK: 4-16-07 suppressed MSNBC report on another Va Tech gunman.
  
  
• Nico "Hitler" Haupt vs. Alex "Revere" Jones
  
  
• Dweezil Zappa & Ozzy Osbourne: Stayin' Alive

  Labels: fetzer, police state, revere radio, Ron Paul, tvfakery

Thursday, April 17, 2008

Labels: 9/11, tvfakery

Monday, February 11, 2008

• MP3 LINK
  
  This epsiodes focuses on 9/11 issues:
  
  PumpItOut.com speaks with alleged 9/11 cameraman Evan Fairbanks; callers discuss 9/11 tvfakery, 9/11 victim Edna Cintron, and 9/11 exoweaponry; new reports on political conflicts of interest in the Kean/Hamilton/Zelikow 9/11 Commission.

  Labels: 9/11, 9/11 commission, exotic weaponry, revere radio, tvfakery

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

MP3 DOWNLOAD


• comments on the assassination of John Lennon ; Jack Blood archive via nw0.info
  
  
• EXCLUSIVE information on the new thoughtcrime bills in Congress
  
  
• Ron Paul on Iran; Ron Paul blimp
  
  
• BREAKING NEWS -- 9/11 researchers send 9/11 video-faker running like a little girl
  
  
• Brian Wilson mashes himself
  
  
• CLG update on mall shooting; earlier report

  Labels: 9/11, assassination science, beatles, false flag, iran, police state, revere radio, Ron Paul, tvfakery

Sunday, December 02, 2007

MP3 DOWNLOAD

Ron Paul on SCHIP

Revere Radio host & producer Guymon Adams calls in on K-Ville, the post-Katrina propaganda television seres.

Veteran 9/11 researcher Nico Haupt updates us on the state of play six years later.

Nico Haupt vs Dylan Avery (Loose Change)

Legendary comedian and activist Dick Gregory on 9/11

CNN quizzed on its 9/11 "ghostplane" footage by pumpitout.com.

Labels: 9/11, revere radio, Ron Paul, tvfakery

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

MP3 DOWNLOAD HERE


• KT from Killtown with a 9/11 research update
  
• California wildfires as Agenda 21 repopulation endgame plan
  
• Exclusive audio of Hon. Capt. Dr. Ron Paul (ret.) speaking at American University

  Labels: 9/11, Agenda 21, Ron Paul, tvfakery

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

The National Institute of Standards and Technology finally responded earlier this month and denied a Request for Correction (RFC) filed by Dr. Morgan Reynolds regarding its 9/11 report. Reynolds has offered some preliminary thoughts at his NoMoreGames.net:

"At the appropriate time I will formally appeal NIST's decision, but meanwhile I have filed two requests to obtain NIST data under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) so that I may properly exercise my appeal rights:
• Video evidence from original sources of airplanes at the WTC, held on a secure NIST server
• NIST contract with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) and related documents regarding the NIST work performed by SAIC

[...]

Airplane Video Fakery

So-called live videos of the south tower plane "event" showed a plane image disappearing behind the South Tower wall, although at least one shows a plane's nose momentarily exiting the opposite north side, then fade to black, an obvious "overshooting" error in video fakery. Subsequent videos of airplane image entry into the south tower emerged in days, months and years later. These "penetration" videos show impossible physics like little or no deceleration, which NIST and its contractors have accepted at face value. These impossibilities were modeled, allegedly via sophisticated methods, according to the NIST response to my RFC: "The models used to analyze the aircraft impact into the towers fully capture the constitutive properties of the aircraft and the building materials and account for the deformation, fracture, and failure of these materials as well as conservation of momentum and energy." NIST, of course, did no such thing. NIST did not account for the conservation of momentum and energy because energy can only be spent once. Energy consumed in fracturing tower materials and impressing a cartoon-like outline of an airliner's silhouette of passage is not available for constant speed. The event as depicted by NIST is impossible.

NIST asserts in its defense, "By using original sources of photographic and video evidence and by using a NIST expert to obtain copies of material directly from these original sources, NIST was able to ensure the integrity of the photographic and video evidence used in the investigation. Further, all photographs and video records obtained by NIST are kept on a secure server with access limited only to authorized NIST personnel." Am I supposed to accept NIST assertions at face value? Does NIST deny, for example, that the FBI had custody of the Evan Fairbank video for hours and returned only part of the video to Fairbank? NIST does not comment. NIST claims it "collected photographs and videos from original sources only," yet evidence showing physically impossible events like no crash and no deceleration in the plane image must be fake unless NIST believes Newtonian mechanics no longer apply. "Further, all photographs and video records obtained by NIST are kept on a secure server with access limited only to authorized NIST personnel," NIST asserts. Secret evidence is no evidence at all. Until shown otherwise, I am told to rely on NIST assertions, undocumented, without proof. To properly pursue my appeal, that is, confirm NIST's claims independently, I must have access to the photographic and video evidence NIST has denied to me and other taxpayers. I will file a FOIA request to obtain this evidence in order to properly exercise my appeal rights.

Are SAIC's Hands Clean?

In my supplemental letter, I asserted that SAIC had a clear and palpable conflict of interest and offered evidence to support that proposition. "SAIC was contracted by NIST to provide administrative support to the team conducting the investigation," NIST responds. "They did not perform technical work in support of the investigation." Yet NIST offers no proof and no documentation for the claim that SAIC did no technical work, only administrative work. SAIC was the largest NIST contractor with 25 employees assigned, followed by ARA with 9, so it is hard to believe that SAIC performed no technical work. SAIC does not reveal the job titles and professional training of its employees and NIST likewise has kept its WTC contract with SAIC secret. I will file a FOIA request to obtain this NIST contract and all related evidence to discover the work SAIC performed.

Are ARA's Hands Clean?

My original RFC identified ARA as the principal contractor hired to analyze plane impacts and create relevant animations. I obtained this data from the NIST contract with ARA as presented on NIST's website. But NIST is silent about the role ARA played in plane analysis and animation. The NIST published contract with ARA clearly specified that ARA would perform analyses and animations of plane impacts on the towers. If accurate, ARA plainly violated Newtonian mechanics and substituted patently false physics in its analyses and animations and is therefore culpable for fraudulent and misleading misrepresentations. What role did ARA play? Unless NIST reveals ARA's role with supporting evidence, I may have to file a FOIA request regarding the work ARA performed.


-----

Labels: 9/11, ARA, NIST, SAIC, tvfakery

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

From Newsday Oct 9:

"He'd flown helicopters during the Vietnam War, and later in New York City for WABC-TV, as a news pilot, brought viewers close to countless horrific events: the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, the Staten Island ferry crash and the recent steam pipe explosion in Manhattan.

But on Sunday evening it was doing something comparatively safe - standing on a midtown sidewalk - that put Paul Smith in harm's way. Police say Smith, 60, of West Islip, and his wife Donna, 55, had just left a restaurant when a taxicab jumped the curb and ran over him.

Smith was taken to Bellevue Hospital Center where he was pronounced dead on arrival. Yesterday, his wife remained there in stable condition with a fractured leg. A 7-year-old boy had his arm broken in the crash, police said. It was not clear whether he was related to Smith.

No charges have been filed against the driver, who tested negative for alcohol.

Police were reviewing security cameras and investigating the accident, which took place at Third Avenue and East 40th Street. They said the cabbie said he was swerving to avoid another car.

The driver, Mohammed Chowdury, told reporters last night he was forced off the road by a black car that cut him off. He had been driving a cab just five weeks, he said.

-----



Interesting claims by the transient driver of this death-car, no?

A June interview of the reporter with Smith in the official WABC chopper on 9/11 indicated that Smith's chopper flew away from the scene before the South Tower event ... so whose WESCAM helicopter camera system produced this shot? Who didn't want Smith to say what he knew?

Labels: 9/11, assassination science, dead witnesses, tvfakery

Monday, October 08, 2007

Hat tip FalseFlagNews.com:



Note Gen. Ralph Eberhardt, late of NORAD< on the upper right.

ObjectVideo is a leader in "intelligent video," i.e., insertion of computer-generated data including images ("cartoons") into real video.

An ObjectVideo-linked patent

Labels: 9/11, norad, tvfakery

As the SAIC-scripted TOPOFF4 drill approaches next week, flashback to this item from February...

From Federal Computer Week Feb. 8, 2007:

"As part of an exercise involving a simulated terrorism attack, the Homeland Security Department wants to gauge the extent to which the public would trust information DHS releases electronically.

Like its predecessors, the fourth Top Officials (TopOff) exercise is intended to test the nation's readiness to deal with a large-scale terrorist attacks. This time, the exercise will test the department's public communications strategy.

The idea is to give the public information that is as complete and timely as possible about the events surrounding the attacks and what actions they should take to protect themselves. DHS will provide that information in two formats: a live video feed and a Web site. The live feed will resemble a newscast, according to DHS, featuring interviews with public officials and other experts, while the Web site will function more like a newspaper.

DHS recently released a notice requesting likely sources for a possible yearlong evaluation of the public's understanding of the information the exercise will produce, and its trust in and compliance with the messages included.

The TopOff 4 exercise will be held in Portland, Ore., and Guam and follows a preliminary exercise held in June last year called TopOff 4 Command Post Exercise (TopOff 4 CPX), which involved more than 4,000 people from more than 85 federal, state, local and private industry organizations.

That exercise for the first time also included DHS, the FBI and the Federal Emergency Management Agency to test the coordination capabilities of the various participants. The lessons learned from that event will be carried through into this year’s exercise.
[...]
-----

Labels: homeland security, propaganda, SAIC, terror drills, tvfakery

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

MP3 DOWNLOAD

This week's program features:

• Dr. Ron Paul's weekly legislative update, about the health-care control grid
  
• Background on a new neocon war-propaganda offensive
  
• Analysis of Dr. Paul's performance in the GOP Presidential debate for black folks
  
• 9/11 research and COINTELPRO updates with Nico Haupt
  
• PumpItOut.com pumps a drunken Iraq vet for the real skinny.
  
• Music from R.E.M., dr.O, and Johnny Cash

  Labels: 9/11, cointelpro, directed-energy, iran, Ron Paul, tvfakery

Monday, September 17, 2007

Time-Warner television host Bill Maher, who has previously made a point of calling pharmaceutical drugs "poison," on Friday endorsed the drugging of Americans who don't endorse the treasonous 9/11 myth propagated by his corporate masters. Maher retreats to the "television is reality" meme, which is breaking apart under the relentless assault of independent 9/11 TVfakery researchers who must contend both with mainstream shills such as Maher as well as perps and dupes inside the "9/11 movement" itself.

Video:



Labels: 9/11, mind control, mockingbird, ssri, tvfakery

Monday, August 27, 2007

Labels: 9/11, mockingbird, pentagon, tvfakery, wtc

Sunday, August 12, 2007

More audio is available from the "Science of 9/11 Conference" held at the beginning of the month:


• Opening remarks by Dr. James Fetzer, Prof. Emeritus UMinnesota-Duluth
  
  
• Remarks from Barbara Honegger of the Naval Postgraduate School
  
  
• Remarks from Dr. Kevin Barrett, late of UWisconsin-Madison
  
  -- Audio from Revere Radio Network coverage.

  Labels: 9/11, directed-energy, tvfakery

Friday, August 10, 2007

MP3 DOWLNOAD HERE

On the latest program:


• Peggy Carter of NYC911truth with a recap of the "Science of 9/11" conference in Madison, Wisconsin
  
  
• Audio of alleged 9/11 "ghostplane" cameraman Michael Hezarkhani refusing to comment on the CNN video.
  
  
• More on the 9/11 Science conference from Rosalee Grable of www.thewebfairy.org

  Labels: 9/11, revere radio, tvfakery

Wednesday, August 08, 2007

Thanks to CheckTheEvidence.com for archiving Revere Radio Network's live coverage of the "Science of 9/11" conference held this past weekend in Madison, Wisconsin:


• Judy Wood - Madison 9-11 Science Conference - Hour 1 - 04 Aug 2007.mp3
  
  
• Bob Fritrakis - Madison 9-11 Science Conference - 04 Aug 2007.mp3
  
  
• Judy Wood - Madison 9-11 Science Conference - Hour 2 - 04 Aug 2007.mp3
  
  
• Jerry Leaphart - Official Responses to DEW - Madison 04 Aug 2007 (Poor Audio Quality).mp3
  
  
• Alfred Webre and Comments - Madison 9-11 Science Conference - 05 Aug 2007.mp3
  
  
• Morgan Reynolds - Madison 9-11 Science Conference - 05 Aug 2007.mp3
  
  
• Ace Baker - Madison 9-11 Science Conference - 05 Aug 2007.mp3
  
  
• Jim Fetzer and Closing Comments - Madison 9-11 Science Conference - 05 Aug 2007.mp3

  Labels: 9/11, directed-energy, I-35W, tvfakery

Friday, August 03, 2007

REVERE RADIO NETWORK will feature live coverage this weekend of a conference put on by Scholars for 9/11 Truth. The conference is called "The Science of 9/11: What's Controversial, What's Not?" Live coverage will be featured from 10am ET to 12midnite Saturday and 10am ET to 2pm Sunday.


• LISTEN LIVE HERE
  
• FULL CONFERENCE SCHEDULE (TIMES CDT)

  Labels: 9/11, exotic weaponry, tvfakery, wtc

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

MP3 DOWNLOAD

This 100-minute edition of Total Information Radio aired on Revere Radio Network Monday night. Highlights:


• Hear actor/lecturer tell Gary Welz WPIX he saw an airplane hit the World Trade Center, a story he has since retracted. Hear another "9/11 eyewitness" who appears to be Welz in disguise.
  
  
• Callers!
  
  
• The last lost BEATLES track? Samarkhand Mystery Tour
  
  
• Peggy Carter of NYC911truth with an update ongoing 9/11 litigation, and announcing an upcoming 9/11 truth video installation by avant-garde artist Nico Haupt.
  
  
• Excerpts of and commentary on the Congressional hearing examining the Environmental Protection Agency's pronouncements on 9/11 air quality.
  
  
• Killtown offers thoughts on Gary Welz and 9/11 censorship.

  Labels: 9/11, beatles, dust, revere radio, stj911, tvfakery

Sunday, June 24, 2007

Federal Communications Commission licenses for New York and New Jersey television stations expired on June 1. Applications for license renewal by WABC-7 and by WNYW (FOX5) have been "accepted for filing" but, the license renewal has not yet been granted.

Until the renewal application is granted, the FCC will accept "informal complaints" from residents of the New York City market (i.e., anywhere you can receive New York television stations over the air, including Northern New Jersey).

The procedure is simple. Viewers must send the FCC a complaint detailing the station's breach of the public trust. The complaint should be sent in triplicate (three copies) -- the first with an ink signature, the other two copies of the orginal. The headers should include a reference to the application umber as well as the correct FCC address, thusly:

ATTN: Video Division, License Renewal Processing Team
Room 2-A665
Office of the Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
c/o Natek, Inc.
236 Massachusetts Ave., N.E.
Suite 110
Washington, DC 20002

RE: Station call sign: WABC (Channel 7)
City and State: New York, New York
Station facility Identification number: 1328
License renewal application file number: BRCT-20070201BHD

For the separate complaint regarding FOX5, the last four lines of the header should read:

RE: Station call sign: WNYW (Channel 5)
City and State: New York, New York
Station facility Identification number: 22206
License renewal application file number: BRCT-20070201AJS

The complaints should point out that the station in question may be in violation of the FCC hoax rule, Section 73.1217:

This rule prohibits broadcast licensees or permittees from broadcasting false information concerning a crime or a catastrophe if: (1) the licensee knows this information is false; (2) it is foreseeable that broadcast of the information will cause substantial public harm; and (3) broadcast of the information does in fact directly cause substantial public harm.

If the broadcast of the CGI airplane animations on 9/11 were intentional and known to the management or owners of the station (Disney-ABC and News Corp-Fox), the stations are in breach of the hoax rule because the panic caused by the broadcasts brought about substantial public harm via the resultant overseas conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as the expansion of the domestic police state via the USA PATRIOT A Even if the broadcasts were somehow unintentional, the negligence in failing to disclose the falsity of the broadcast at a later date is a breach of the public interest.

Some suggested points to make in the complaints follow.

Regarding WABC-7:
• ABC News reporter Don Dahler reported no plane hit the south tower even as the video feed showed an airplane image and anchor Charlie Gibson from the studio asserted an airplane hit.
  
• The plane image broadcast on WABC was stop-motion across each frame, indicating a computer generated animation. Actual footage of an actual airplane would have revealed "go-motion" blurry images.
  
• WABC-7 helicopter camera operator John DelGiorno has said the helicopter camera system used was an Ultramedia system, yet a WESCAM logo is clearly visible on the camera rig.
  
• DelGiorno claims the WABC7 helicopter was in motion at the time of the South Tower event, yet the WESCAM shot is relatively stationary.
  
• The blackout in the camera feed immediately after the South Tower event.
  
• The 17-second-separated audio anomalies are present on the WABC feed, synchronized to similar anomalies on other feeds.

Points regarding WNYW (FOX5):
• The "nose-out" through the north face of the building indicates a CGI image, particularly since no exit hole was evident on the north face.
  
• The plane image is missing from the wide shot 11 seconds before the South Tower event.
  
• The suspicious blackout in the helicopter feed following the nose-out indicates an attempt at cover-up.
  
• The purging of the footage form the Internet by WNYW is a clear proof that that WNYW is acting against the public interest in denying access to this footage by researchers and the public. WNYW has purged the footage from YouTube and on the Internet Wayback Machine at www.archive.org, WNYW has replaced the video track of the South Tower event with video from CBS (while retaining the original Fox5 audio track).

In dealing with a regulatory agency like the FCC, remember that several individual (even if similar or duplicative) complaints are more powerful than one complaint co-signed by several people. This is an important opportunity for NYC-area activists to have their voice heard and possibly force a response from Disney-WABC-7 and NewsCorp-FOX5-WNYW.

Labels: 9/11, fcc, foxnews, tvfakery

• MP3 AUDIO DOWNLOAD
  
  In this episode of Total Information Radio, which aired live on Revere Radio Network Monday June 18:
  
  
• NYC 9/11 truth activist Peggy Carter talks about working with folk legend Pete Seeger to spread the word about 9/11 at Seeger's Clearwater Festival on the Hudson River.
  
  
• Discussion on challenging the FCC licenses of television stations which broadcast false airplane images on 9/11.
  
  
• Callers examine the deep politics of 9/11 truth infiltration.
  
  
• PumpItOut.com interviews WABC helicopter cameraman John DelGiorno about his role on 9/11.
  
  
• CNN reports latest Iraq Golden Mosque bombing is "an inside job."

  Labels: 9/11, iraq, revere radio, tvfakery

The following presentation examines Gary Welz, an actor/lecturer, who apparently donned a disguise to play the part of an "air crash witness" in footage aired on MSNBC on 9/11/2001. Welz is a founding member of the disinformation cell STJ911, who in an interview with CBS News, denounced Scholars for 9/11 Truth for examining classified, exotic weaponry in relation to the destruction of the World Trade Center.


Someone claiming to be Welz, in a comment on 911researchers.com, has now denied that it was him in the MSNBC interview:

Yes, I am an actor and an adjunct lecturer at John Jay College and I was an eyewitness on 9/11 but I did not participate in fake news interviews or say anything about 9/11 except what I believe to be true. The person interviewed on Fox [sic.; i.e.: MSNBC] who looks a bit like me is definitely not me. I support the 9/11 truth movement and I'm very surprised to find myself attacked in this way...

Labels: 9/11, stj911, tvfakery

Saturday, June 23, 2007

A very interesting presentation about synchronized audio anomalies that occur 17 seconds apart across all live TV network feeds as the "2nd hit" event unfolded on the morning of September 11, 2001.

While this film contends that the first anomaly indicates the actual time of the explosive event in the south tower, that seems incorrect and a more likely expplanation would be that it was rather the cue for the cgi upload of an airplane into the Future Combat Systems cameras which were wired into the mainstream media.



Labels: 9/11, tvfakery

Monday, June 11, 2007

Labels: 9/11, tvfakery

Saturday, May 19, 2007

From ccuracy in Media May 16 2007:

"Rudy Giuliani's much-publicized but misleading put-down of Ron Paul during Tuesday night's Republican presidential debate should have been tempered by a report that Saudi Arabia, the country that spawned most of the [alleged] 9/11 hijackers, has been one of Giuliani's lucrative foreign clients. However, Fox News questioners Chris Wallace and Wendell Goler did not bring it up.

Perhaps this can be explained by the fact that the same Associated Press story that named Saudi Arabia as a Giuliani client listed News Corporation, the parent company of Fox News, as another Giuliani client. This AP story, which was not disputed by Giuliani or News Corporation, was carried on the Fox News website.

This writer had raised questions about Fox News' co-sponsorship of the debate, based on the fact that the company had a relationship with Giuliani when he was mayor of New York City. But now we know that the relationship has continued into the period of time that Giuliani has been planning a presidential run. It is an obvious conflict of interest.

It was during a discussion of foreign policy that Paul, a Texas congressman, identified U.S. involvement in the Middle East, especially in Iraq, as a factor in the 9/11 attacks. Giuliani pounced on that, saying the claim was worse than absurd. "Rudy's Wrath" was the headline as Fox News proclaimed Giuliani the winner of the exchange. However, the Fox News text-message poll, with 40,000 votes, gave Paul 25 percent over Giuliani's 19 percent. Mitt Romney came in first with 29 percent.

Giuliani was the first Republican candidate to come on Fox News after the debate and talk about his performance. Co-host Sean Hannity wanted to focus on Giuliani's comments on 9/11 and his attack on Paul. Later, Michael Steele, Maryland's former Lieutenant Governor, was on Fox News, declaring that Giuliani had destroyed Ron Paul. "It's done," Steele said of Paul's campaign. It wasn't mentioned that Giuliani had campaigned for Steele when he ran for a Maryland Senate seat.

The exchange with Paul over 9/11 might have been seen in a different light if Hannity had asked Giuliani about why, according to the AP report, his firm represented Saudi Arabia. But that was a taboo topic.

Equally important, it turns out that Paul's point-that the 9/11 attacks were linked to U.S. involvement in Iraq and the Middle East-was factually correct. Osama bin Laden's 1996 "Declaration of War against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places" specifically mentioned the situation in Iraq, blaming the U.S. for the impact of economic sanctions on the Saddam Hussein regime. Bin Laden accused the U.S. of "aggression" against Iraq and the record shows that his anti-Americanism was motivated, at least in part, by the U.S. military presence in Saudi Arabia.

Yet, Giuliani claimed "I don't think I've heard that before," in reference to Paul's citation of some of these facts. One would think that "America's Mayor" and "Mr. 9/11" would understand the genesis of the attacks that took almost 3,000 American lives.

Despite the facts of the case, Fox News correspondent Steve Brown said it was a matter of "Mission Accomplished" for Giuliani because of his exchange with Paul. Of course, "Mission Accomplished" has become associated with a war in Iraq that has no end in sight. Paul has been against the Iraq War from the beginning. He made the point, as he had during the first debate on MSNBC, that the war had cost the GOP control of Congress. Senator John McCain tried to insist that Republicans had lost Congress because they had been spending too much federal money. He didn't explain why the public had replaced the Republicans with bigger spenders from the Democratic Party.

[...] Fox News seems determined to run Paul and other candidates out of the race.

Steve Doocy of Fox News called Ron Paul the "Sanjaya" of the Republican presidential debate, a reference to the American Idol contestant many believe stayed in the national competition for too long. But this is reality turned upside down. Fox News didn't want its audience to know the facts behind the exchange. Especially with his controversial Saudi and other foreign connections, Giuliani may end up looking like the real "Sanjaya" of the race. [...]

Giuliani was completely spared any tough questions about his controversial dealings with foreign clients. Neither Wallace nor Goler brought up the growing controversy over the Giuliani law firm representing a Spanish company that is privatizing a Texas road in the proposed "NAFTA Superhighway." The same firm, Bracewell & Giuliani, represents Citgo, the oil company owned by Venezuela...

Fox News had attempted to limit participation in the debate to the so-called "serious" candidates before a public outcry forced all of them to be included. That ploy was seen as an effort to cement Giuliani as the frontrunner. After the debate, Fox News correspondent Carl Cameron was again trying to limit the field, declaring that the "second-tier candidates" had slowed down the exchanges. He implied that candidates like Paul, Duncan Hunter and Mike Huckabee should be left out of future debates.

Fox News has a reputation as a conservative news channel and many Republicans rely on it for news and information. But its handling of this debate raises serious questions about the channel's commitment to being "fair and balanced." It seems to be emerging as an arm of the Giuliani-for-president campaign. Honest conservatives should demand better coverage.
-----

Labels: foxnews, sir rudy, tvfakery

Monday, May 14, 2007

While the use of CGI "plane" inserts on "live" 9/11 coverage is now well-established, 9/11 video researchers are moving into new territory. The following video presentation makes a good case that some greenscreen trickery was used in composing "instant replay" shots of the disintegration of the towers which were shown later in the day. But if this is so, to what end? More research is necessary.




• From the 9/11 Octopus series.

  Labels: 9/11, tvfakery

Thursday, March 22, 2007

Rosie O'Donnell received a show of support on her birthday from 9/11 inside-jobbers on her birthday Wednesday, in light of recent comments she's made regarding WTC7 and KSM. But will she take it to the next level and finger the 9/11 involvement of her employer ABC/Disney?

From 911tvfakery.net:

" 911tvfakery.net joined a protest in front of the lobby of "The View" (Rosie O'Donnell, ABC), NYC.

[...]

911tvfakery.net arrived at 9:00 AM and tried to hand out leaflets to the waiting audience, with mixed reactions. At around 9:30 AM the local nyc911 activist group around Luke Rudkowski, R Rod and Tom Foti arrived at the spot and started to deliver their leaflets and DVDs as well (911bloglines reported).

The group including NY911Truth and CHANGE members also tried to deliver a DVD, leaflets and a t-shirt birthday present to Rosie O'Donell, but got rejected several times by security.

At around 10:00 AM ABC7 decided to call the police. Three police cars then joined the peaceful protest group, always switching between two doors of the lobbies.

Apprx. 30-40 Protestors chanted "9/11 was an Inside Job", "Stop the 9/11 Cover-Up- join Rosie's View" or sang "Happy Birthday to you, Rosie". The protest was succesfully organized with enough leaflets, banners and DVDs.

[...]

After a few unsuccesful attempts at the lobby entries on opposite sides of the building, finally at around 11:30 AM, 911tvfakery.net was able to get a DVD with 100 of the best 9/11 Video MashUps (including evidence on 9/11 TV fakery) personally delivered to O'Donnell with help of "Freddie", a flower delivery guy, who stuck the DVD and leaflet into a flower buquet and promised to hand it over...

Text message of 911tvfakery leaflet:

What about ABC7's "9/11 TV Fakery" Cover-Up, Rosie ?

Ask Don Dahler!

http://www.911tvfakery.net
http://911logic.blogspot.com
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=ewing2001

http://livevideo.com/ewing2001
http://livevideo.com/genghis6199
http://livevideo.com/bsregistration
http://livevideo.com/total411info
http://livevideo.com/Coffinman
http://livevideo.com/killtown

http://www.911bloglines.com
http://www.911researchers.com


The DVD included 100 of the latest best 9/11 Video Mash-Ups (1.3 gb).
-----

Labels: 9/11, tvfakery

Monday, March 19, 2007

MP3 AUDIO of the March 13 2007 edition of Total Info Radio.

Fred from BSregistration and KT from killtown join wide-ranging discussion on 9/11 video mashups, 9/11 tv fakery, and copyright as censorship.

Background information:


• 9/11 Octopus Part 8
  
• Hoodwinked at Shanksville, Pt. 1: Back in Black Boxes
  
• Yoko censors Lennon-BEATLES documentary
  
• 9/11 Family Guy: Flight 37 tvfakery
  
• 9/11 Octopus - New World Order (Rough Full Length Pre-Release Cut)
  
• Debunking CNN's Whitehall ghostplane

  Labels: 9/11, intellectual property, revere radio, shanksville, tvfakery

Saturday, March 10, 2007

Labels: 9/11, AA11, tvfakery

Monday, March 05, 2007

MP3 AUDIO of Total Info Radio Feb. 27 2007, the first successful live program.


• 9/11 War of the Worlds update
  
• new OKBOMB affidavit from Terry Nichols
  
• KT from Killtown on corporate censorhip and 9/11 Shanksville
  
• Caller on assault weapon ban bill
  
• pop music murders with Jarrett from Revere Radio's Save Yer Generation

  Labels: 2nd amendment, 9/11, OKBOMB, shanksville, tvfakery

Thursday, March 01, 2007

In which blogger Ningen tutors Los Alamos' Dr. Jones on academic standards. Ningen's blog January 16, 2007:

"One of Jones' three main arguments in support of his "planes" thesis, which he presents as a rebuttal of the "no planes theory," is the deceleration argument, as follows:

An 18% deceleration of "Flight 175" during its impact with the South Tower, which Jones states can be observed in a video by Evan Fairbanks, is consistent with the expected loss of kinetic energy from such an impact as modeled by Tomasz Wierzbicki, Professor of Applied Mechanics in MIT's Department of Ocean Engineering and director of the department's Impact and Crashworthiness Laboratory.

My criticism is that Jones does not address subsequent research done by Karim and Hoo Fatt who are on the engineering faculty at the University of Akron, and who address Wierzbicki's model in concluding that a much higher amount of kinetic energy would be lost in such an impact.

[...]

Both Jones and Salter should have disclosed and addressed this contradictory data that was published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Engineering Mechanics.

I have now learned of other pertinent and contradictory data that was not disclosed by Jones and Salter, even though it was available 9-12 months before each of their publications.

NIST NCSTAR 1-5, pages 24-26, analyzes the Scott Myers video of "Flight 175" and concludes that the tail of "Flight 175" "did not slow as the aircraft entered the building."

I repeat: "the tail did not slow as the aircraft entered the building."

That means 0% deceleration, as opposed to the 18% found by Salter and cited by Jones.

Jones and Salter state that the plane decelerated 18% in support of their conclusion that the video of "Flight 175" is real, but do not disclose NIST's data and conclusion to the contrary.

Please click on the below JPEGs of three pages from NIST NCSTAR 1-5, pages 24, 25, and 26.

Read section 2.3.2, Estimated Aircraft Speed on the first page. It refers to Figure 2-7 on the second page, which is frames of the Scott Myers video on the second page. It also refers to Figure Figure 2-8 on the third page, which shows parallel lines of pixel location of the nose and tail over time, and which NIST says is evidence that the tail of "Flight 175" in the Scott Myers video "did not slow as it entered the building." [...]



Note that Jones used the lower graph in support of his "planes" thesis, as discussed here.

Thus, he cannot reasonably argue that he did not know about the upper graph on this page, which contradicts Salter's 18% deceleration result.

Note also that both of these results were obtained from NIST's analysis of the same Scott Myers video (the "stable video in section 2.3.3 of the above page of NIST text). How can Jones offer the second graph but not the first, without acknowledging the first graph and explaining why he thinks it is invalid?

At Journal of 9/11 Studies, Jones published a Power Point presentation, dated July 2006...

Jones cites the Scott Myers video as evidence that a Boeing 767 hit the South Tower:


[...]
In the page below, Jones cites an analysis of the Evan Fairbanks video by Eric Salter, who concludes that the video shows an 18% deceleration as "Flight 175" enters the South Tower...Jones fails to cite to the NIST study of the Scott Myers video that he used in the previous page, and which showed 0% deceleration as opposed to 18% deceleration. One can also see that he failed to disclose the Karim/Hoo Fatt study which found a 46% loss in initial kinetic energy from piercing the external columns alone, without considering the increased resistance of the external columns when backed by floors, without considering the resistance of the floors themselves, and without considering the resistance of the core columns.



Salter's 18% deceleration compared to Hoo Fatt's 46% kinetic energy loss (really much closer to 100% as I show in my paper) gives a drastically larger discrepancy that would not be "consistent with the data within allowable tolerances."

NIST's result compared to Hoo Fatt's data gives an even more drastic discrepancy, and that's without even considering the massive resistance of the floors and core columns found in Wierzbicki's paper,as Hoo Fatt looked only at the resistance of the external columns.

Jones' own reasoning is that the relationship between observed deceleration and modeled kinetic energy loss is important evidence of a video's authenticity or lack of authenticity.

Any one of these combinations proves that the videos of "Flight 175" slipping into the South Tower are falsified.

Given Jones' failure to disclose these results, he has no business stating that the "assertion . . . real commercial jets did not hit the WTC towers . . . has been disproved by the evidence."

By his own reasoning, this assertion has been proved by the evidence that he fails to acknowledge.

I ask Steven Jones to be more careful in the future about academic standards, both in his own work and in his editing of the Journal of 9/11 Studies.

-----

This is a slightly condensed version of an essay which can be found in full here. The most valuable conclusion to take away from this data is that in Ningen's first endnote, "It may be that neither the Scott Myers video nor the Evan Fairbanks video are authentic, or it may be that one but not the other is authentic." Thus the conclusion that TV fakery was a central component of the 9/11 psy-op is inescapble.

Labels: 9/11, tvfakery

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Found on YouTube:


Labels: 9/11, tvfakery

Thursday, February 15, 2007

MP3 DOWNLOAD

This podcast examines witness accounts of an aircraft crashing into the South Tower of the World Trade Center on 9/11 in light of Orson Welles' 1938 "War of the Worlds" broadcast.

Show notes:


• Wikipedia: War of the Worlds 1938 broadcast
  
• 9/11 live on ABC with Don Dahler and Charlie Gibson
  
• Grover's Mill New Jersey - MuseumofHoaxes.com
  
• Four-way live-shot comparison
  
• 9/11 WESCAM
  
• Ghost plane 175
  
• Casper 175
  
• Homeland TOPOFF4 drill to test propaganda capability

  Labels: 9/11, mind control, tvfakery

Sunday, February 11, 2007

From Federal Computer Week Feb. 8, 2007:

"As part of an exercise involving a simulated terrorism attack, the Homeland Security Department wants to gauge the extent to which the public would trust information DHS releases electronically.

Like its predecessors, the fourth Top Officials (TopOff) exercise is intended to test the nation's readiness to deal with a large-scale terrorist attacks. This time, the exercise will test the department's public communications strategy.

The idea is to give the public information that is as complete and timely as possible about the events surrounding the attacks and what actions they should take to protect themselves. DHS will provide that information in two formats: a live video feed and a Web site. The live feed will resemble a newscast, according to DHS, featuring interviews with public officials and other experts, while the Web site will function more like a newspaper.

DHS recently released a notice requesting likely sources for a possible yearlong evaluation of the public’s understanding of the information the exercise will produce, and its trust in and compliance with the messages included.

The TopOff 4 exercise will be held in Portland, Ore., and Guam and follows a preliminary exercise held in June last year called TopOff 4 Command Post Exercise (TopOff 4 CPX), which involved more than 4,000 people from more than 85 federal, state, local and private industry organizations.

That exercise for the first time also included DHS, the FBI and the Federal Emergency Management Agency to test the coordination capabilities of the various participants. The lessons learned from that event will be carried through into this year’s exercise.
[...]
-----

Labels: propaganda, terror drills, tvfakery

Sunday, January 28, 2007

Labels: 9/11, tvfakery

Monday, October 30, 2006

More top-quality research on 9/11 TV fakery continues to emerge from 911.blogger.com. The most recent concerns video from the morning of 9/11 that aired live on WNYW television in New York City. What is curious about this footage is the wide shot from the helicopter immediately before the South Tower incident at 9:03:00 am. Using the quarter-mile high towers as a reference, we can see that the field of view of the camera about 11 seconds beforehand extended to about three miles south of the towers. Now, if there was a standard Boeing airliner headed north toward the towers, it would have easily been seen in this shot, being about as long as the clearly-visible towers are wide.

Yet, there's no plane there -- which would seem to indicate that the plane image which appeared 11 seconds later was likely computer-generated.

Here's the first set of back-of-the-envelope calculations which appeared on 911blogger.com 10/25/2006:

" From the towers to the right side of the video (south) is about 3 miles.

From the time the video starts to the time the plane appears is about 11 seconds. The plane was traveling at approximately 500 MPH = 8.33 MPMinute = .138 MPSecond. So 11 seconds * .138 MPSecond = about 1.5 miles.

Therefore the plane should have been approximately half way between the tower and the right side of the frame (field of view). The plane, given its size, should have been CLEARLY visible. BUT ITS NOT THERE.
[...]
The fact remains that the plane is not in the picture. And, I'm not a no-planer, but this is just bizarre.

I hate loose ends (no pun intended). When I started the experiment I assumed that the calculations would show that the plane would have been outside the field of view. UGH!
-----

Brian Vernon of Scholars for 9/11 Truth followed up with similar calculations. Again, from 911blogger.com 10/28/2006:



For reference:


• Short WNYW clip
  
• Long WNYW clip
  

  Labels: 9/11, tvfakery

Friday, October 27, 2006

Worth a listen: The Sept. 18 edition of Total Information Radio, covering the fifth anniversary of 9/11 is now available as an mp3 download. Check it out.

Featuring:


• An exclusive interview with a 9/11 eyewitness. What he saw from across the Hudson River may surprise you.
  
• How that witness' testimony dovetails with Dr. Morgan Reynolds' latest speculations on what happened in Manhattan on 9/11. And audio of Reynolds on Fox News Channel.
  
• An interview with Nico Haupt on 9/11 TV fakery and activism on the fifth anniversary of 9/11.
  
• Your host and Nico Haupt talk 9/11 TV fakery with 9/11 scholar Jim Fetzer.
  
• Media figure Barry Zwicker quizzed on 9/11 TV fakery.
  
• Zwicker on Noam Chomsky.
  
• All this and more!

  Labels: 9/11, tvfakery

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

Audio now available of the September 18 2006 Total Information Radio:


• An exclusive interview with a 9/11 eyewitness. What he saw from across the Hudson River may surprise you.
  
• How that witness' testimony dovetails with Dr. Morgan Reynolds' latest speculations on what happened in Manhattan on 9/11. And audio of Reynolds on Fox News Channel
  
• An interview with Nico Haupt on 9/11 TV fakery and activism on the fifth anniversary of 9/11.
  
• Your host and Nico Haupt talk 9/11 TV fakery with 9/11 scholar Jim Fetzer. [TRANSCRIPT]
  
• Media figure Barry Zwicker quizzed on 9/11 TV fakery.
  
• Zwicker on Noam Chomsky.
  
• All this and more!
  
  It's one jam-packed hour.
  
  Total Information Radio streams live on Revere Radio Network Monday nights at 9pm ET.

  Labels: 9/11, tvfakery

Due to listener request, a partial transcript of the exchange between Nico Haupt and Jim Fetzer featured on this week's Total Information Radio:

"(Cooper Union, Manhattan. 7:26pm ET Sept. 10, 2006)

JIM FETZER: Listen, I did a whole book on the alteration of the Zapruder film.

NICO HAUPT: [inaudible] the missle hit the Pentagon video [inaudible]

JF: Pentagon video [inaudible]... got nothing to support that.

TOTAL INFORMATION (To Fetzer): Your research on the Zapruder film helped open me up to what Nico is doing on 9/11 TV fakery.

JF: Oh, good. Interesting. I'm not prepared to go quite where Nico is right now.
I'm certainly not prepared to deny that film has been altered.

TI: I read your Assassination Science book, it's quite good.

NH: [inaudible]

JF: You've got Murder [in Dealey Plaza] too?

TI: No, I don't.

JF: You got to get Murder, it's the best book on JFK. Defintitely the best book ever on JFK.

NH: In my new presentation, I've laid over the video so the buildings are the same size [inaudible] at the right angle. In one video, entering bit by bit [inaudible] other footage, the cgi... You just have to see the overlay to see it.

JF: Maybe I will eventually come around on this. I'm just not there yet. Maybe never. But I'm fascinated by it.

-----

Labels: 9/11, tvfakery

Monday, September 18, 2006

Tonight on Total Information Radio on the Revere Radio Network:


• An exclusive interview with a 9/11 eyewitness. What he saw from across the Hudson River may surprise you.
  
• How that witness' testimony dovetails with Dr. Morgan Reynolds' latest speculations on what happened in Manhattan on 9/11. And audio of Reynolds on Fox News Channel
  
• An interview with Nico Haupt on 9/11 TV fakery and activism on the fifth anniversary of 9/11.
  
• Your host and Nico Haupt talk 9/11 TV fakery with 9/11 scholar Jim Fetzer.
  
• Media figure Barry Zwicker quizzed on 9/11 TV fakery.
  
• Zwicker on Noam Chomsky.
  
• All this and more!
  
  Total Information Radio streams live on Revere Radio Network Monday nights at 9pm ET; with archives soon to follow.
  
  
• 08KBps live stream
  
• 32 KBps live stream

  Labels: 9/11, tvfakery